How mobile money benefited Kenya

The M-Pesa mobile money system has helped reduce poverty in Kenya.

The M-Pesa mobile money system has helped reduce poverty in Kenya.

Published Jan 5, 2017

Share

A recently  published study on

the long-run effects of mobile money on economic outcomes in Kenya provides

some valuable insights that will benefit economic development and financial

inclusion policies across Africa.

The study found that increased access to mobile money has

reduced poverty in Kenya, particularly among female-headed households. Rapid

expansion of mobile money has lifted an estimated 2 percent of Kenyan

households (some 194 000) out of extreme poverty. It has also enabled 185 000

women to move out of subsistence farming and into business or sales

occupations.

Mobile money is a form of electronic money that allows

you to conduct financial transactions using  your

mobile phone. It allows financial services to be extended to unbanked

people at a significantly lower cost because physical infrastructure isn’t

needed.

Mobile phone penetration is rising across sub-Saharan

Africa, with  almost 76

percent of the population having a mobile phone subscription. The

growth in mobile phone ownership raises the potential for mobile money to reach

unbanked people, providing them with a more affordable payments system.

M-PESA, Africa’s first mobile money platform, was

launched by Safaricom in Kenya in 2007. The service was designed to enable

remittances to be sent home, and has enjoyed widespread adoption. Today  96 percent of

households outside Nairobi have at least one M-PESA account.

Poverty reduction

The impact on poverty reduction appears to be the result

of improved financial behaviour – by facilitating easier and safer savings –

and changes in the occupational choice of users.

Mobile wallets offer a secure place to save as funds are

stored virtually. And both the mobile money facility and the mobile phone can

be password-protected. Savings can be used during hard times or for productive

investments, like establishing or expanding a small business.

Before mobile money the transaction costs of sending

money over large distances were high. This was true both in terms of time as

well as the financial resources needed to effect transactions.

High transaction costs meant that households were limited

to forming risk sharing networks with others in close proximity. This reduced

the effectiveness of informal risk sharing as all households in the network

were vulnerable to experiencing the same shocks at the same time. Examples of

shocks that could affect an entire community include droughts, fires, crop or

livestock diseases and floods.

Mobile money enables quicker, cheaper and more reliable

money transfers over greater distances. In turn, this has allowed mobile money

users to diversify their informal risk-sharing networks and draw on a wider

network of social support.

Impact of M-PESA

M-PESA has significantly reduced transaction costs in

Kenya. When it was launched the average distance to the nearest bank was 9.2

kilometres. Eight years later in 2015 the average distance to the nearest

M-PESA agent  was

a mere 1.4km.

When M-PESA started it created a network of agents that

were geographically dispersed which meant that more people in rural and

sparsely populated areas were within reach of one. This resulted in significant

and widespread adoption.

Now that mobile money users are able to form more diverse

risk-sharing networks, it’s not surprising that users, compared with non-users,

tend to receive more remittances from more people. This is particularly marked

when users are responding to negative shocks.

Mobile money users are therefore more financially

resilient and can protect themselves better against economic and other shocks.

It also allows them to increase their consumption in bad times. This is key to

enabling households to lift themselves out of extreme poverty.

The recent findings also show that in areas that have

experienced large increases in access to mobile money people were more likely

to be working in business or sales rather than in subsistence farming.

Additionally, fewer people in these areas reported having secondary

occupations.

Both these findings were seen to be particularly true for

women. This was found to be true in female-headed households as well as

male-headed households. An estimated 185 000 women have been induced to switch

from subsistence farming to business or sales as their primary occupation as a

result of mobile money access.

That mobile money has a positive impact on economic

outcomes for women is particularly notable when seen against some historical

studies on related subjects. For example, studies on the impact of

micro-finance on female clients, and on the economic returns to capital grants

for female-operated small businesses,  have

tended to show limited results.

This may reveal something crucial. For women, the route

out of poverty may be financial inclusion that allows them to better manage

their existing financial resources, rather than increasing their financial

resources from credit or grants.

This finding has significant implications for policy and

poverty-reduction efforts.

More to come

As other products built on mobile money platforms are

developed, financial inclusion is deepened and users are empowered to improve

the management of their financial resources.

Other products allow users to, for example, earn interest

on savings, access micro-loans and affordable insurance, and  invest

in government securities.

Mobile money has been transformational in Kenya, and has

the potential to similarly benefit the rest of sub-Saharan Africa.

THE

CONVERSATION

Sarah Logan is an economist at the

International Growth Centre.

 

Related Topics: