How sugar helped hook America on cigarettes

AP Photo/Petros Karadjias

AP Photo/Petros Karadjias

Published Dec 18, 2016

Share

New York - The damage and death that cigarettes cause are well

known. “We produce a product that causes disease,” Andre Calantzopoulos,

the CEO of Philip Morris International, told the BBC last

month in announcing an alternative cigarette the company says should be less

harmful.

As the popularity of smoking has plummeted in the US, health

advocates have turned to another adversary, which they say has taken tobacco's

place: the food industry. Comparisons between the two show up with regularity,

especially when it comes to marketing to children. The same arguments

public health experts aimed at Joe Camel are now being wielded against

food companies that use cartoons, video games, and other targeted marketing to

reach the same demographic of loyal customers-to-be. 

But the connection between junk food and cigarettes runs a lot deeper,

as Gary Taubes details in a revelatory chapter of his book The Case

Against Sugar, set to be released on December 27.

Taubes—the author of Good Calories, Bad Calories and Why

We Get Fat, and the recipient of three Science in Society Journalism

awards from the National Association of Science Writers and a Robert Wood

Johnson Foundation Investigator Award in Health Policy Research—argues that sugar

is the main driver of the chronic diseases plaguing Western civilization in the

21st century, including (but not limited to) diabetes, heart disease, and

obesity.

Read also:  Nursing group hails sugar tax

“If this were a criminal case,” he writes in the author’s note,

“The Case Against Sugar would be the argument for the prosecution.” That

argument is convincing, if sometimes long-winded.

But wedged between chapters on the long history of humans’ insatiable

lust for sugar (fun fact: New Guinean creation myths from 10 000 years ago

involve “the sexual congress of the first man and a stalk of sugarcane”) and

the economic resilience of sweets is a little-known story: the alliance between

the sugar and tobacco industries.

Natural

sugar

Tobacco itself has a natural sugar content, which curing alters. While

flue-curing increases the sugar content, making the tobacco more palatable

for smokers, it also results in lower content of nicotine, an addictive

stimulant. By early in the 20th century, the industry had found a way

to make its product both more enjoyable to smoke and higher in nicotine. Air-curing

Burley tobacco creates relatively high levels of easily absorbed nicotine;

sugar-soaking, which follows, enhances flavor.

Soon, “sugar-sauced” Burley tobacco was being blended into R.J.

Reynolds’s Camels, and other manufacturers followed suit, Taubes

writes. By 1929, more than 50 million pounds of sugar a year were being

used to “candy up” the tobacco in more than 120 billion

American cigarettes. 

“It is well recognized that sugar and other sweeteners have the ability

to mask bitter and other undesirable flavors,” Courtney Gaine, president of the

Sugar Association, which represents the industry, said in an e-mail. “While we

have not read Mr. Taubes’ book,” she added, “the 60+ year old report referenced

does not reflect The Sugar Association current activities or science

priorities.” 

TMA, which represents the tobacco industry, said it didn’t have

expertise in the area.

Genius

For this chapter, Taubes relies largely on Tobacco and Sugar, a 1950

report by the Sugar Research Foundation, the industry trade group at the time,

that openly celebrated the union.

“Were it not for sugar,” said Wightman Garner, a former US Department of

Agriculture tobacco official quoted in the report, “the American blended

cigarette and with it the tobacco industry of the United States would not have

achieved such tremendous development as it did in the first half of this

century.” Later in the report, the author refers to the development as

“this most promising field of sugar utilisation.” The combination, the report

says, was a “stroke of genius.” 

Recent industry-funded research has found that the added sugar doesn't

increase the toxicity of the cigarettes, but other studies confirm that it

does make cigarettes taste better, getting people to smoke more of

them. 

Read also:  Sugar tax 'bad news for jobs'

Even though sugar remains a component of modern-day cigarettes, few

people realise it. “It’s virtually unknown,” Taubes said in an interview, noting that

the topic was discussed in Sugar Blues, an anti-sugar classic from

1975, and Golden Holocaust, which railed against cigarettes in 2012.

Taubes considered omitting it from his book, because it wasn’t central to his

case about sugar in the diet. 

Ultimately, he figured, “How can I not tell this story in this book?”

BLOOMBERG

Related Topics: