Is the government spying on you?

AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File

AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File

Published May 30, 2017

Share

Johannesburg – Civil

society group Right2Know is alleging that law enforcement is using a

legislative loophole to force SA’s cellular operators hand over sensitive

information about clients.

In a statement issued

on Tuesday, the group said it had issued

applications in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act

requesting information on how often Cell C, MTN, Telkom and Vodacom hand over call

information.

R2K has, for

some time now, been convinced that state agencies are spying on South Africans.

However, it has not had proof of such as taping into phones without a warrant

is illegal, and there are no stats available to back up its assertions.

In the

statement, R2K cites a recent Daily Maverick report, which exposes a loophole.

It says Daily Maverick  reported on a legal loophole that

allows magistrates to authorise thousands of 'surveillance operations' every

year, forcing telecommunications companies such as MTN, Vodacom, Telkom and

Cell C to hand over sensitive information about their customers’ communications

- their call records.

This, it says,

bypasses the RICA law; the Regulation of Interception of Communications and

Provision of Communication-Related Information Act. This law means that

everyone must register their SIM card, but also places strict rules on when,

and by whom, cellphone records can be accessed.

R2K says, “we

don't know how often this loophole is used, but we need to know. This is why

R2K has filed requests for information using the Promotion of Access to

Information Act (PAIA) asking all major telecoms companies to disclose how

often the loophole is used. PAIA states that a request for information must get

a response within 30 days.”

Read also:  US government to secretly spy on citizens

R2K notes: “While

there is growing awareness on RICA's surveillance protocols, which states that

someone’s communication may only be intercepted if authorised by a specially

appointed judge (the “designated judge”), few people are aware that

surveillance is also being authorised outside RICA – possibly at a far higher

rate.”

R2K argues that

the loophole is in s205 of the Criminal Procedures Act,  which allows law enforcement

officials to bypass the RICA judge and approach any magistrate

for a warrant that forces a telecoms company to give over a customer’s call

records and metadata if that person is under investigation.

“However, that

person is never notified, even if the investigation is dropped or if they are

found to be innocent. A person's call records contain incredibly sensitive

information, and needs high levels of protection to enforce the constitutional

right to privacy.”

The Daily

Maverick article quoted the Ministry of Justice and Correctional Services as

saying it could not indicate how many orders, under the Criminal Procedure Act,

were granted. However, the Ministry did say it was reworking RICA.

It noted SA only

has one RICA judge, in Pretoria, which the article argues is why the CPA is

used, as it bypasses RICA.

What has R2K

asked for?

R2K has filed PAIA requests with MTN, Telkom, Vodacom and Cell C, asking them

to disclose statistics of how many warrants they have received via s205 of the

Criminal Procedures Act, for the years 2015 to 2017. These requests do not ask

for any sensitive information or customer information, just how many times a

year the network providers have been forced to hand over customer information.

It notes these

requests do not ask for information about warrants that have been issued by the

RICA judge, as RICA’s secrecy provisions forbid the telecoms companies from

disclosing such information.

We

call on MTN, Vodacom, Telkom and Cell C to take their customers into their

confidence, and reveal how often sensitive data is handed over to government

agencies.”

BUSINESS REPORT

ONLINE

 

Related Topics: