EU relieved at Scotland's “no” vote

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso.

Published Sep 19, 2014

Share

Brussels/Paris - European Union and NATO officials expressed undisguised relief on Friday at Scotland's clear vote against independence from Britain, but some fretted that the genie of separatism may be out of the bottle in Europe.

EU partners had mostly kept quiet in the run-up to Thursday's referendum, lest their fears of a break-up of the United Kingdom leading to contagion elsewhere in Europe be seized upon as interference.

But as soon as the Scottish “No” was secure, they voiced satisfaction and drew consequences for their own countries, for the 28-nation EU and for the Western alliance.

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen congratulated British Prime Minister David Cameron and said he was sure the United Kingdom would continue to play a leading role in keeping the US-led defence alliance strong.

Spain's two mainstream national parties welcomed the outcome as showing that the northwestern region of Catalonia, expected to announce bitterly opposed plans on Friday for its own independence referendum, would be better off staying in Spain.

In Brussels, the European Commission said the Scottish vote was good for a “united, open and stronger Europe” - a veiled message that EU officials hope the outcome will strengthen chances of Britain voting to stay in the bloc in a promised referendum in 2017.

“The European Commission welcomes the fact that during the debate over the past years, the Scottish government and the Scottish people have repeatedly reaffirmed their European commitment,” Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said.

 

“CATACLYSMIC”

Belgian EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht, whose native Flanders region is in thrall to a growing nationalist movement, said a Scottish split would have been “cataclysmic” for Europe, triggering a domino effect across the continent.

“If it had happened in Scotland, I think it would have been a political landslide on the scale of the break-up of the Soviet Union,” said De Gucht, a liberal who does not support demands from some of his fellow Flemings for their own state.

“A Europe driven by self-determination of peoples ... is ungovernable because you'd have dozens of entities but areas of policy for which you need unanimity or a very large majority,” he said, adding that “parts of former countries” might behave in a very nationalistic ways.

Even before Scottish polls closed, French President Francois Hollande expressed his fear of a possible “deconstruction” of Europe after decades of closer integration.

“That is what is happening at the moment, this conjunction of centrifugal forces that is losing sight of the European objective,” he told a news conference on Thursday, citing a danger of the break-up of the EU and individual member states because they were no longer seen as protecting citizens.

France is one of the EU's most centralised states, with little support for independence movements in Corsica, Britanny and the Basque Country. But other member states such as Spain, Italy and Belgium face bigger pressure for decentralisation.

The president of the European Parliament, German Social Democrat Martin Schulz, told Deutschlandfunk radio that while he had refrained from commenting on an internal British matter before the vote, he was “relieved by the result”.

Asked about the EU's ability to respond to independence efforts in regions like Catalonia and Flanders, Schulz said: “The EU has the problem that it must keep the 28 sovereign states together. I don't think it's possible to expect EU institutions to resolve from Brussels domestic problems such as regional politics, calls for autonomy and ethnic differences.”

However, Brussels would have to review treaty provisions for newly declared independent states wanting to join the EU because “if Scotland had declared independence today then all the other 28 current member states including England ... would have had to vote against Scotland joining”, he said.

Separatist movements in Europe were often fuelled by “social inequality and a wealth gap, where richer regions say we don't want to pay to support other regions”, as well as unemployment, income inequality and rural poverty, Schulz said.

 

“NOT ENTIRELY MAD”

Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka said the Scottish result made him happy because “I take it as yet another proof that the world has not gone entirely mad.”

The Social Democratic leader said that if Britain had fallen apart, it could have led to a wave of nationalism that would have destabilised a number of other European countries.

However, several European policymakers speaking on condition of anonymity said Scotland had also set a precedent of regions' having a democratic right to vote on independence, which could be problematic in Spain and elsewhere.

While the Scots' vote may settle the issue of separation in Britain for a generation, as Cameron said, it will also cause constitutional upheaval with much greater devolution of power in the UK, and may whet appetites across Europe.

Former German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher, who helped negotiate German reunification in 1990, said the vote showed that strongly centralised government was out of favour on the continent.

“Germany's model of a federal system with a central government and independence for the states and municipalities is the more modern system,” he said. - Reuters

Related Topics: