Japanese ownership ruffles feathers

Comment on this story

Angry Chinese nationalists finally woke up yesterday to the fact that Japanese and US companies own more than half of e-commerce juggernaut Alibaba, and have done for years.

“Who is Jack Ma working for?” asked some on microblogs, hours after Alibaba Group Holding filed a prospectus for an initial public offering (IPO) of its shares in the US, which some say could be the biggest listing of a technology stock.

Ma was the lead founder of Alibaba in 1999 and has become something of a cult hero to entrepreneurs and many ordinary Chinese, saying he champions small business against industry giants.

“Jack Ma is a big traitor,” wrote another user on Tencent Weibo, a major Twitter-like Chinese microblogging site.

In its IPO prospectus, Alibaba detailed ties with its two principal shareholders: Japanese telecoms firm SoftBank, which owns a 34.4 percent stake, and Yahoo, with 22.6 percent.

SoftBank invested in Alibaba 14 years ago, and Yahoo bought a 40 percent stake in 2005. Both holdings have long been public knowledge and have been covered in previous disclosures.

Yet this old information triggered a clamour of dismay and indignation among some anti-Japanese internet users in China yesterday, who also noted that Ma was only the third-biggest shareholder in Alibaba, with 8.9 percent. – Reuters


sign up
 
 

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

  5. Verified email addresses: All users on Independent Media news sites are now required to have a verified email address before being allowed to comment on articles. You are only required to verify your email address once to have full access to commenting on articles. For more information please read our comment guidelines