British banks look to beat bonus caps

A visitor stands inside skyscraper Heron Tower as the Canary Wharf business and shopping district stands in the distance in London, U.K. on Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. The owners of Heron Tower, one of the City of London financial district's tallest skyscrapers, reached a 370 million-pound ($600 million) refinancing deal that includes a new loan from Starwood Capital Group LLC, a person with knowledge of the matter said. Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

A visitor stands inside skyscraper Heron Tower as the Canary Wharf business and shopping district stands in the distance in London, U.K. on Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013. The owners of Heron Tower, one of the City of London financial district's tallest skyscrapers, reached a 370 million-pound ($600 million) refinancing deal that includes a new loan from Starwood Capital Group LLC, a person with knowledge of the matter said. Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

Published Dec 3, 2013

Share

In the 1990s, London-based investment banks rewarded top employees with gold bars, fine wine and oriental carpets to dent the impact of higher payroll taxes.

Now, with public anger at banking excess near all time highs, they are looking at less flashy ways to cope with curbs on bonuses, including a new monthly allowance.

European rules due to take force in January say bankers’ bonuses cannot exceed annual salary, or twice that if shareholders approve, to curb the sort of excessive risk-taking blamed for the 2008-09 financial crisis.

Salaries have not dropped in line with banks’ revenues since the crisis, consultancy McKinskey said this month, despite a series of huge, taxpayer-funded bank bailouts.

At least 10 000 bankers, most of them in London, take home more than e500 000 (R6 938 400), according to industry sources, more than 10 times the average wage in wealthier European states.

With much of pay currently in bonuses, the biggest banks in London, including Deutsche Bank, Barclays and JP Morgan, look certain to bump up salaries.

Britain and the banks in what is Europe’s financial capital argue that the new rules play into the hands of competing financial centres such as New York, Hong Kong and Singapore.

They also say it provides less scope to claw back pay if it turns out an individual had taken too much risk, and limits the ability to pay bonuses in shares awarded in the future.

The cap affects all “risk taking” staff for EU banks and the European staff of those outside the trading bloc, so all major investment banks are affected, including US lenders such as JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs.

“There’s absolutely no question that fixed pay is going to rise,” said Jon Terry, partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). “But the standard response may not be by increases in salary, by far the most common response will be the introduction of allowances.

“They are a bit more flexible, but it will fundamentally involve a shift of a proportion of variable pay into fixed pay.”

Britain’s Barclays last week said that it would increase fixed pay using such a structure. It plans to give bankers in specific risk-taking roles an additional monthly payment, set at the start of the year and to run for 12 months.

The top-up will not be included in pension calculations and could rise or fall depending on demand for a particular role.

Other banks, such as JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank and HSBC, are expected to consider similar plans, and could vary the structure with longer payment terms or by paying it quarterly.

 

Riskier?

While raising fixed pay is likely to be the most obvious response to the bonus cap, generous housing allowances and loyalty payments could also be considered.

HSBC chief executive Stuart Gulliver said that he would “take whatever steps necessary to protect the competitiveness” of his bank.

Terry said more than 80 percent of 40 banks surveyed by his firm last month had indicated that they planned to use allowances as their primary response to the bonus cap.

The British government has launched a legal challenge to the legislation arguing that it will force up fixed salaries, making the banks riskier rather than safer.

“Firms’ remuneration strategies may become less flexible which could make adjustment during periods of stress more difficult, undermining financial stability,” the UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority said.

But other countries do not think the EU is going far enough.

The Dutch government on Tuesday said that it would cap bonuses at banks at no more than 20 percent of total salary from 2015, although overseas staff could get higher amounts.

The European Banking Authority (EBA), the watchdog overseeing the rule, said any staff earning more than e500 000 a year were likely to be affected.

 

Public disapproval

It could also include any employee whose bonus is at least e75 000 and 75 percent of their fixed pay, or anyone paid more than the lowest member of senior management. The rules will be finalised early next year.

Some 3 175 bankers earned e1 million or more in the EU in 2011, indicating at least 10 000 people would be caught by a rule covering any employee earning half that amount, according to published salary scales.

The British Bankers’ Association has said that more than 35 000 people could be affected at 10 major banks it surveyed, representing 5.5 percent of their global workforce.

More than three-quarters of the top EU bank earners were based in London, fuelling the city’s property prices, swanky restaurants and upmarket shops.

In 2011, the bonuses of London’s top bankers were 3.5 times fixed pay, EBA data showed, meaning their employers would need to switch almost e400m to fixed pay from bonuses to meet the new rules in aggregate.

The rules come into effect in January, but will not apply to bonuses for 2013, which are typically paid in February and March.

Barclays said that it had discussed its plan with regulators and shareholders.

Investors are keen for banks to rein in pay, and George Dallas, director of corporate governance at F&C Investments, said that banks needed to follow the spirit of the law as well as the letter to avoid “further regulatory scrutiny and public disapproval”.

“How banks respond to this (bonus cap) regulation will be one of the key issues in 2014,” Dallas said.

Bonuses for 2013 at most investment banks are expected to be flat or slightly lower than the year before, following a drop in revenues. – Reuters

Related Topics: