Joe Brock
THE COST of the Ebola epidemic on sub-Saharan Africa’s economy was likely to be closer to between $3 billion (R33bn) and $4bn, rather than a worst case scenario of $32bn, the World Bank’s chief economist for the continent said yesterday.
Francisco Ferreira, speaking at a lecture in Johannesburg, said successful containment of Ebola in some west African countries made its gloomiest forecasts less likely, although economic damage could still escalate if there was any complacency.
“The risk of the highest case of economic impact of Ebola has been reduced because of the success of containment in some countries. It has not gone to zero because a great level of preparedness and focus is still needed,” Ferreira said.
He said, however, that the Ebola crisis had already ravaged tourism in Africa because the “fear factor” kept visitors away from countries even where there had been no cases of the virus, like Kenya and South Africa.
In a report in October on the possible economic impact of the Ebola epidemic, the World Bank had said that if the virus spread significantly outside the epicentre states of Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia, this could potentially cost Africa tens of billions of dollars in disrupted cross-border trade, supply chains and tourism.
The bank said a scaled-up global response was needed to prevent this worst case scenario.
Since then, the UN has led international efforts to send more medical personnel to the Ebola zone and increase funding to fight the worst recorded outbreak of the deadly haemorrhagic virus.
The latest World Health Organisation Ebola tally on Friday reported 5 177 deaths out of 14 133 cases. They mostly occurred in the three worst-hit countries. Ferreira also highlighted a more than 30 percent drop in global oil prices since June as a major concern for the fiscal stability in African oil producers, particularly the continent’s largest crude exporter, Nigeria. – Reuters