Pregnant teens to be protected from stigma

A new draft policy which sets out how schools should support pregnant pupils and protect them from discrimination is expected to be published for public comment before the end of the year.

A new draft policy which sets out how schools should support pregnant pupils and protect them from discrimination is expected to be published for public comment before the end of the year.

Published Jul 27, 2015

Share

Leanne Jansen

DURBAN: A new draft policy which sets out how schools should support pregnant pupils and protect them from discrimination is expected to be published for public comment before the end of the year.

The policy is expected to put an end to schools expelling or excluding pregnant pupils, and will emphasise that pupils have the right to remain at school during and after their pregnancy.

The new draft policy is expected to deviate substantially from the 2007 policy, which stated that should a pupil be aware of a peer’s pregnancy, they should immediately inform the school.

According to the old policy, pregnant pupils may be “required” to take a leave of absence, which could extend to two years.

“No learner should be readmitted in the same year that they left school due to a pregnancy,” the 2007 policy states.

At the SA Aids Conference held in Durban recently, the Department of Basic Education had referred to the new draft policy being in the works.

Spokesperson Elijah Mhlanga last week confirmed the document was in the process of being refined, and that a review of the old policy had become necessary because of cases in which schools asked pregnant pupils to leave school entirely, or for a certain period.

One such case, in the Free State, went all the way to the Constitutional Court. The Free State schools – Welkom High and Harmony High – were ordered to review policies which sought to keep two pupils out of the classroom during their pregnancies.

And, two years ago, the Equal Education Law Centre intervened when two pregnant girls from a Gauteng school were forced to be absent from school before giving birth, and for three months thereafter. The pupils were also asked to pay a R200 deposit for use in case of an emergency.

The law centre argued that the matter highlighted the need for clarity, at national level, on how schools should assist pregnant pupils and ensure that the girls finished school.

In a parliamentary reply to a question posed by DA MP Sonja Boshoff, Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga disclosed that 20 000 South African schoolgirls had fallen pregnant last year – 3 000 of whom lived in KwaZulu-Natal.

A recent study found that of a sample of 673 girls aged 15 to 18 who were childless in 2008, the teens who later became mothers had twice the odds of dropping out of school by 2010, and nearly five times the odds of failing to matriculate.

The study, published last month in the journal Studies in Family Planning, is the work of UCT Professor Tom Moultrie and Professor Ian Timaeus, from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Timaeus and Moultrie used data from South Africa’s National Income Dynamics Study which suggested that interventions which addressed poor school performance would also reduce teenage pregnancies in South Africa.

Their study shows how pregnant pupils were treated in various provinces, and from school to school. Some teachers were against having pregnant girls and teen mothers in school even when it contradicted the school’s official policy.

Timaeus and Moultrie argue that late enrolment at school, and repeating grades, raised girls’ chances of giving birth as teenagers.

Girls from low-income backgrounds attending fee-charging schools were most likely to be behind at school, and at highest risk of becoming mothers as a result.

One explanation was that those girls who were failing at fee-charging schools (who often came from poorer backgrounds), may experience greater stigmatisation and alienation from the system than low achievers at no-fee schools.

The Basic Education Department’s new draft policy will emphasise the right to education, to dignity, and to privacy. It will seek to reduce unintended pregnancies among pupils, and arm teenage mothers with the knowledge to make informed choices on health care during pregnancy and after giving birth.

It is expected to stipulate that each school appoint a teacher who pupils may talk to about preventative measures and health care during pregnancy – in a confidential and non-judgmental manner.

Pupils who did decide to take a leave of absence from school were to be allowed to do so without being deregistered and without having their academic records scrapped.

Examples of unfair discrimination and harassment included expressing judgmental attitudes towards pregnant pupils; disciplinary measures would now be taken against pupils or teachers who discriminated against other pupils either of being pregnant, or being new mothers.

Schools would be barred from treating schoolgirl pregnancy as a matter of misconduct.

Related Topics: