Advertorial

Where have you been? Win over 1 Billion ZAR.

Smaller bar doesn’t wash with consumers


Protex bar

ING

Three readers contacted the writer recently to complain about the shrinkage of Protex bars of soap from 200g to 175g.

Consumers don’t take kindly to the discovery that a product they regularly buy has been “downsized” – ever so slightly, in the apparent hope that they won’t notice.

In other words, less product for your money.

Consumers generally regard this as sneaky.

But the bottom line benefits are apparently worth the ripple of consumer discontent – and the massive costs of downsizing and repackaging products – because the trend continues unabated, both here and abroad.

Three readers contacted me recently to complain about the shrinkage of Protex bars of soap from 200g to 175g.

“We are being shortchanged,” wrote Bunny Govender.

“I think we should be made aware of this in the same way as the manufacturers promote ‘100g free’ or whatever – in bold print on the packaging.”

Good point, but I doubt any marketing exec would sign off packaging that screams “Now 25g less!”

Charles Te Water wrote: “Pick n Pay is selling the 175g Protex soap at R3.50 more than the price of the old 200g pack.

Duncan Baker noted that the reduction in weight had been achieved by creating “a cut-out” in the original bar’s shape.

“We are just a smidgeon away from having a huge piece of cardboard inserted in the packaging of a chocolate bar, with a minuscule piece of chocolate on top.

“No doubt this will be described as something the customer wanted to protect the product against damage,” he said.

I asked Colgate-Palmolive’s legal director, Seneca Veeran, why the soap bar had been made smaller, rather than putting up the price of the 200g bar in a transparent way.

Responding, Veeran said the company had last year decided to make Protex bars “more affordable” to consumers, hence they reduced the size of the bars.

“This year, manufacturers’ costs in the bar soap category have risen significantly due to the currency devaluation and much higher prices for raw materials, and we raised the list price to the retail trade to account for these higher costs,” she said.

Be warned, “more affordable” doesn’t mean a better or cheaper buy. It means you’re paying less and getting less for your money.

One wonders how much products will continue to shrink in order to appear “more affordable”.

sign up

Share |  

Facebook icon

Facebook

Twitter icon

Twitter

Google icon

Google

Yahoo icon

Yahoo

Reddit icon

Reddit

del.icio.us icon

del.icio.us

Pinterest icon

Pinterest

Email

Print

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (0 votes) 0 Stars
Newspaper Subscriptions
PHAKWANE
I'm a 38 year old man looking to meet women between the ages of 18 and 40.
View Profile
ramokolos
I'm a 34 year old man looking to meet women between the ages of 18 and 27.
View Profile
STONE_228
I'm a 39 year old man looking to meet women between the ages of 18 and 35.
View Profile
IOL - dating
sungoddess009
I'm a 35 year old woman looking to meet men between the ages of 34 and 38.
View Profile
IOL - dating
shab_146
I'm a 34 year old woman looking to meet men between the ages of 34 and 42.
View Profile
IOL - dating
BlinG
I'm a 20 year old man looking to meet women between the ages of 18 and 21.
View Profile

Business Directory