Article Search

 Indian couple to pay UCT's legal fees
    Karyn Maughan
    March 07 2005 at 02:52PM
Get IOL on your
mobile at m.iol.co.za

An Indian couple will not continue with their legal battle against the University of Cape Town's admissions policy, after the Cape High Court refused to rule that their daughter be admitted to UCT's medicine programme.

High Court Justice Rosheni Allie last week declined to make an order that the couple's 17-year-old daughter, identified only as Sunira, be provisionally admitted to study medicine - pending a full judicial review of the university's medical school admission policy.

She also ruled that the couple should pay UCT's hefty legal costs.

Sunira was one of over 2 100 people who applied for 200 positions to study first-year medicine at UCT. Her parents decided to take UCT to court after her friend, Student B, also an Indian girl, was accepted by the university although her marks were not as good.
Continues Below ↓





'What is meant by disadvantaged... will no doubt occupy the attention of the court'
She is currently studying for a BSc at UCT.

UCT admitted that it had offered the second girl a place in the belief that she was African. When it discovered its error, the university withdrew its offer, but reinstated it when the girl's parents threatened legal action.

Counsel for Sunira's parents, Norman Arendse, SC, and Anton Katz, claimed that the university's "purported admissions policy" discriminated against Indians.

They pointed to documents that showed that all African and coloured students who applied to study medicine at UCT were considered to be "educationally disadvantaged" even if they attended private schools.

By contrast, Indian students are divided into categories according to whether they attended private or government schools and are regarded as not having received a disadvantaged education under apartheid.

Judge Allie said UCT and Sunira's parents had agreed that the university's admission policy appeared to be discriminatory, but said they differed on whether "the discrimination is reasonable, justifiable and necessary to redress the past inequalities".


Continues...


Email StoryPrint Story
BOOKMARK THIS STORY
Social bookmarking allows users to save and categorise a personal collection of bookmarks and share them with others. This is different to using your own browser bookmarks which are available using the menus within your web browser.

Use the links below to share this article on the social bookmarking site of your choice.

Read more about social bookmarking at Wikipedia - Social Bookmarking

muti



Subscribe now to Cape Argus
     Related Articles
More Education stories

Watch IOLs latest videos on YouTube Join IOLs Facebook page Follow IOL on Twitter





     Online Services

Date Your Destiny
 
I'm a 28 year old woman looking to meet men between the ages of 25 and 35.
 

     More Services

     More Education Stories

     Breaking News      Most Read Stories
      Top News Stories
      Top South Africa Stories
      Top Reads - Yesterday



     Entertainment      Motoring
Paris Hilton secretly engaged?
Stars head for Durban city lights
Heidi plans love box for Seal

     Business
MTN to offer World Cup footage on mobiles
South AFrican happy with Zuma
Little tax relief in this year's budget
FIRST DRIVES: Hyundai's new 'Tucson' and sexy Sonata
Toyota SA in huge accelerator-pedal recall
Xtra power, Xtra styling for BMW's X5
Classic machines howl at Killarney Historic meeting
Yamaha, Ducati set pace at Sepang

     Travel
Travel beats marriage as top Valentine's gift
The Apartment makes diners feel at home
New vision strikes a chord
Discovering the pleasure of paradise
Spend 11 nights cruising the Med
     Careers
Changing lanes in the career highway
Getting to grips with the transport industry
To be your own boss, believe in yourself first
Salary survey puts unstable economy into the equation
Development of child is key