No long life from wine, chocolate

There is no proof that chocolate and red wine help you live longer, despite millions hoping they do, scientists claim. Picture: kev-shine, flickr

There is no proof that chocolate and red wine help you live longer, despite millions hoping they do, scientists claim. Picture: kev-shine, flickr

Published May 15, 2014

Share

London - There is no proof that chocolate and red wine help you live longer, despite millions hoping they do, scientists claim.

A study failed to find any evidence that resveratrol, an ingredient found in the skin of red grapes and chocolate, is linked to long life.

The antioxidant is believed to have a range of anti-ageing properties. But researchers say levels found in the body had no “substantial influence” on inflammation, cardiovascular disease, cancer or longevity.

Resveratrol is one of a number of so-called “healthy chemicals” found in red wine, called polyphenols, which are also available as supplements.

Reuters reports that research on animals has suggested resveratrol, a polyphenol also found in some Asiatic plant roots as well as peanuts and berries, may wield beneficial health effects.

Although not proven in human studies, those findings have contributed to a $30-million per year market for resveratrol supplements in the United States alone.

But there has been controversy about whether it really does hold back the march of time, with conflicting results from some studies on chocolate.

US researchers said the latest study was designed to investigate the “French paradox”, the phenomenon of low heart disease rates in France despite a diet high in cholesterol and saturated fat. The paradox has been attributed to the regular intake of red wine, in particular to resveratrol. Dr Richard Semba, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and colleagues recruited 783 men and women aged 65 or older.

All of them had taken part in a study between 1998 and 2009 focusing on two villages in the heart of Italy’s Chianti wine-growing area.

Dr Semba and his team measured resveratrol levels in the urine of the volunteers at the start of the Chianti study in 1998. Over the following nine years 268 of the volunteers died.

Of 639 who had initially been free of cardiovascular disease, one in four (174) developed heart problems, and 34 of the 734 who were free of cancer went on to develop the disease, says a report in JAMA Internal Medicine.

The researchers divided the volunteers into four based on high to low resveratrol intake but found virtually the same proportion of deaths between the groups.

Dr Semba said: “Resveratrol levels achieved with a Western diet…do not show any apparent protective association with disease… and are not associated with lifespan.”

Maureen Talbot, of the British Heart Foundation, said: “People should continue to eat plenty of fruit, veg and wholegrains.

“We recognise the need to learn more about the action of resveratrol though, so are funding research into its reported disease-combatting properties and how it affects the heart and circulatory system.

“This research is vital because it could potentially form the basis of future medicines.”

Reuters quotes Robert Graham, an internist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York, as saying the “French Paradox” is still a mystery.

“This study is a great example of how difficult it is to examine the role of 'the magic bullet' for health and longevity, in this case resveratrol,” said Graham, who was not part of the research.

“As the authors mentioned in their study, studying resveratrol in humans is challenging given different rates of metabolism, utilization and excretion among different people,” he added.

“The recipe for a longer, healthier life is still being developed.” - Daily Mail

Related Topics: