.
BMW X5
BMW has agreed to pay $3 million (R23 million) for delays in reporting safety defects and recalls to the federal regulators, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the US announced recently.
An examination of 16 recalls issued by BMW of North America in 2010 found a pattern in which the company failed to meet federal requirements that known defects be reported within five days.
As part of the settlement, BMW has agreed to make internal changes to its recall process.
“It's critical to the safety of the driving public that defects and recalls are reported in short order,” NHTSA Administrator David Strickland said. “NHTSA expects all manufacturers to address automotive safety issues quickly and in a forthright manner.”
Despite the safety agency's claim that some recall filings were late, “in every case where a defect was identified by the company a voluntary recall had been conducted,” BMW said.
A summary report of NHTSA's investigation said the agency noticed in late 2010 a “troubling trend” in the carmaker's recall filings over the course of the previous year - the company's initial recall filings were missing important information. Each time the problem was brought BMW's attention, the automaker would promise to provide the information but then would take “an inordinate amount of time to do so,” the summary said.
For example, in only 6 out of 16 recall reports in 2010 was BMW able to say how many vehicles were affected and how many were expected to be recalled, the summary said. In only five of the reports did the carmaker supply the required chronology of events, and all but one of the five were missing dates or other important information, the summary said.
NHTSA investigators also complained it was taking BMW on average over 30 dates to supply “fundamental” information missing from recall updates.
The recalls involved motorbikes, as well as SUVs (or SAVs as BMW likes to call them). -Sapa-AP
|
|
zalem, wrote
their vehicles are not designed to last the maintenance plan ,u get fustrated u sell and get another new one hoping the problem goes away
Anonymous, wrote
As the life cycle of models shortens and new models and face lifts are rushed into production so were see sloppy design, engineering and manufacturing processes leaving no space for conclusive durability and safety testing. As it is manufacturers seem to be making their product with conscious in-built obsolescence and limited durability and utility to last only 3 years before consumers are forced to buy new product.The days of classics and owning a vehicle for 10 or 20 years are over. Relentless consumerism and production just adding to, instead of reducing the carbon footprint by making vehicles more durable and to last longer. All this in the name of progress - "and an increasing number of recalls". Strange world.
Showing items 1 - 2 of 2
Services
Business Directory
Comment Guidelines