‘Carmageddon’ fuels car-free LA debate

A woman takes a picture of the eerily empty 405 freeway in Los Angeles, during a shutdown dubbed "Carmageddon" that failed to cause the expected crisis.

A woman takes a picture of the eerily empty 405 freeway in Los Angeles, during a shutdown dubbed "Carmageddon" that failed to cause the expected crisis.

Published Jul 27, 2011

Share

Los Angeles is famous for its addiction to cars - whether cruising in their convertibles, or (more often) sitting in monster traffic jams on the freeway, the car is definitely king for Angelenos.

But a surprise public response to a “carmageddon” warning this month has fueled questions over whether (shock, horror!) Los Angeles drivers could wean themselves off of four wheels, in a state that enjoys year-round sunshine and spectacular scenery, but where smog haze regularly clouds views of the sparkling Pacific.

“You can suddenly hear people talking,” said LA county supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky after the closure of a key stretch of highway failed to produce the feared apocalyptic gridlock - quite the contrary, the roads were eerily empty.

“You hear kids playing. People discovered something about themselves and Los Angeles auto culture that shocked them. Why can't we take some chunk of LA and shut it down to traffic on certain days or weekends, as they do in Italy?”

Before the closure of a 16km stretch of the 405 freeway at the northern end of the LA basin earlier this month, officials blitzed the airwaves with warnings of “carmageddon”.

But in fact drivers who did venture out during the 53-hour closure found roads eerily empty, as millions of Angelenos heeded the warnings to stay off the roads - producing what some called “carmaheaven.”

The closure “demonstrated that Angelenos really can change their driving behaviour if they're motivated to do so,” said an opinion piece in the LA Times, noting that a similar thing happened during the 1984 Olympics in the city.

“It's not hard to get people out of their cars during extraordinary events; the tough thing is doing it on a daily basis,” added the newspaper.

Critics say one reason that can't be done is LA's inadequate public transport system: buses run even slower than cars, and the subway system is OK where it goes, but useless for most people simply due to the city's sprawl.

And walking has never been a real option, except for the shortest of trips, partly because in the summer it's too hot and partly for safety reasons, especially after dark.

Paul Tullis, who writes a blog for the Huffington Post, said carmageddon had provided a unique opportunity.

“How about seizing the opportunity, when the memory of a virtually car-free Los Angeles is still fresh, to enact weekend traffic restrictions to make the region infinitely more enjoyable on the weekends?” he said.

“The picture of a virtually car-free Los Angeles could inspire some big changes, and the benefits seem significant enough to be worth trying different fixes to overcome various obstacles,” he added.

But while carmageddon has triggered debate, skeptics note that it will take more than a marketing campaign to change decades of car culture in America's second biggest city.

“Visitors to LA often express astonishment that Angelenos can tolerate the traffic, but to us it's as natural as botox,” said the LA Times' editorial writer.

“There are other choices: carpooling, motorcycles - even walking. And it's no secret what cities and countries need to do to encourage people to choose them. In Europe and Asia, such incentives are commonplace, and they work.

“Will any of these ideas fly politically in car-crazy LA? Don't hold your breath.” - Reuters

Related Topics: