Teams not pleasured by sex toys


IOL news may 24  ND PenisSharks3

INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS

Sharks and Blue Bulls management are not pleased that their brands have been linked with these pleasure rings.

Vibrating pleasure rings bearing branding similar to two provincial rugby teams are causing a stir.

The cheeky items, created by STA Healthcare and Pharmaceutical Engineering, feature either a blue bull or a shark on the packaging. They went on sale ahead of Saturday’s match.

However, Sean Armstrong, who is behind the concept, said the product was designed with tongue firmly in cheek.

“Some will laugh and some will take it the wrong way. It’s more about the novelty of the item than its actual use as a pleasure ring.”

On a possible trademark infringement, he said he hoped rugby bosses would see the humour in the rings, but his company was prepared for a legal battle if it boiled down to it.

After the much-publicised Tiger Woods sex scandal, Armstrong and his team capitalised on the hype by launching the Tiger’s Wood Pack, which contains condoms and sex enhancements.

“We had a legal battle then with Tiger’s law firm and if we have a similar situation with the rugby bosses, then we are prepared for that.”

Armstrong said sales had exceeded expectations and the first batch of Blouhoring and Shark Attack pleasure rings had sold out.

Sharks chief executive Brian van Zyl said that although he had not seen the items, he disapproved of them.

“All our licences are approved by Signet (licensing and marketing agent). But we would never, ever want the Sharks brand to be associated with something like that,” he said.

Blue Bulls chief executive Barend van Graan agreed, saying he would not want the franchise brand linked to pleasure rings.

“I don’t know anything about it yet, but I will look into it. We have got an agreement with Signet, who handle the licensing of our merchandise.”

Van Graan said all items representing the Bulls brand had to be cleared by the management. - Daily News


sign up
 

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
02:37pm on 24 May 2011
IOL Comments

Just think of it - 30 sweaty, huffing hunks, grabbing each other's groins, playing with balls.... this is not inappropriate after all. No wonder they complain about trademark issues, not the type of merchandise.

IOL Comments

Art, wrote

IOL Comments
02:28pm on 24 May 2011
IOL Comments

Classic! lekka to read a bit of humour for a change. They will never win a trade mark infringement case, there's no wording or artwork copied from the teams... tough luck boys!

IOL Comments

Anthony, wrote

IOL Comments
01:43pm on 24 May 2011
IOL Comments

I also can't see how these products infringe any trademarks. I don't think the term 'blue bull' is trademarked is it? And it bears on resemblance to the current sharks and bulls emblems do they?? I think the media is stirring the pot here, because both teams executives hand't even seen these products yet!

IOL Comments

jeanne, wrote

IOL Comments
01:32pm on 24 May 2011
IOL Comments

This is an absolute hoot. I hope all the old mother grundys out there don't start complaining.

IOL Comments

RyanSmith@telkomsa.net, wrote

IOL Comments
01:22pm on 24 May 2011
IOL Comments

can someone explain to me how that could be a trademark infringement since it says nothing about Blue Bulls rugby (unless its a cure for Blue Balls haha) and the logo is different

IOL Comments

wife cheetah, wrote

IOL Comments
01:22pm on 24 May 2011
IOL Comments

brilliant stuff ...go for it, works like a charm - so I've been told of course ;)

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 6 of 6

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks

Business Directory