Breytenbach disciplinary open to media

122 Advocate Glynnis Breytenbach arrives at Labour court in Braamfontein to fight her suspension which she says came about after investigating Richard Mdluli. 250612. Picture: Bongiwe Mchunu

122 Advocate Glynnis Breytenbach arrives at Labour court in Braamfontein to fight her suspension which she says came about after investigating Richard Mdluli. 250612. Picture: Bongiwe Mchunu

Published Jul 23, 2012

Share

Media must be allowed at the disciplinary hearing of suspended National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach, the High Court in Pretoria ruled on Monday.

“It is of the utmost importance that the media has access to this disciplinary hearing… ,” Judge Ronel Tolmay ruled.

The hearing would deal with matters of significant Constitutional importance and should be in the public domain, she said.

Breytenbach was suspended as regional head of the specialised commercial crime unit on April 30, allegedly for conduct relating to cases allocated to her.

She contended that she believed acting national director of public prosecutions Nomgcobo Jiba suspended her in an attempt to protect former intelligence boss Richard Mdluli.

On Wednesday, Johannesburg Labour Court Judge Hamilton Cele dismissed her application against suspension from the National Prosecuting Authority.

This was because Breytenbach failed to show there were compelling or urgent circumstances to justify a final declaration of the unlawfulness of her suspension, he said.

He said however that if the NPA did exercise its right to discipline Breytenbach, it could be found to be “flouting and frustrating” the aims of an investigation ordered by the High Court in Pretoria into Mdluli's suspension.

On Friday, Media 24, Avusa Media and M-Net launched an urgent application in the High Court in Pretoria on Friday for access to Breytenbach's disciplinary hearing.

Permission for the print media was initially granted by disciplinary hearing chairman Barry Madolo, but the NPA subsequently said Madolo, who has since recused himself from the hearing, had no authority to make such a decision.

The National Director of Public Prosecutions is opposing the application on the grounds that disciplinary hearings are private affairs and that the presence of the media might intimidate witnesses. – Sapa

Related Topics: