Krejcir: Defence questions doc’s report

Comment on this story
iol nws june 14 SS_krejcir tight0 INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS Czech fugitive Radovan Krejcir. Picture: Chris Collingridge

Johannesburg - Injuries sustained by a man who claims to have been assaulted by Czech fugitive Radovan Krejcir could not have killed him, a doctor told the High Court, sitting in Palm Ridge, on Monday.

Dr Sifiso Ndlangamandla examined Bheki Lukhele a few days after the alleged assault.

Under cross-examination by Annelene van den Heever, for Krejcir, Ndlangamandla said Lukhele could not have died from first degree burns he sustained on his head and the side of his face.

Krejcir, Desai Luphondo, Warrant Officers Samuel “Saddam” Maropeng and George Nthoroane, Jan Lefu Mofokeng, and Siboniso Miya face charges of attempted murder for the alleged attack on Lukhele.

They also face charges of dealing in drugs and kidnapping.

“There was mild swelling on his face and head,” Ndlangamandla said, referring to his medical report on Lukhele.

He said he observed no burns on Lukhele's chest, back, or shoulders.

Lukhele previously told the court he had sustained burns and scarring on these areas after Krejcir had poured boiling water from a kettle over his head.

Ndlangamandla, however, said the burns sustained by Lukhele could have come only from hot water and not boiling water.

Boiling water would have resulted in second and third degree burns which would have been accompanied by blisters and severe swelling of the skin.

Lukhele's burns could not have resulted in scarring.

Ndlangamandla also testified that upon his examination of Lukhele, he had not noticed any pain in his chest or stomach.

Lukhele has testified to having been kicked and punched in the stomach.

Earlier, Ndlangamandla said he did not suspect Lukhele had been tortured.

“I did not pick up on the fact that he had been tortured,” he said.

The doctor said had he known that there was a potential of the medical examination assisting in a trial, he would have taken pictures of the patient.

“We usually do so in case information is needed at a later stage,” said Ndlangamandla, the sixth witness to testify in the trial.

Ndlangamandla admitted that he had no recollection of Lukhele nor had he seen him after that examination.

He had, however, been requested to fill in a “J88” - a police medical report - for the trial on February 19, 2014.

He referred to his initial notes to assist him in filling out the form, the court heard.

The police were also present when he filled out the form and provided him with information of how Lukhele had sustained his injuries.

Van den Heever concluded her cross-examination of Ndlangamandla and he was released by the court.

Meanwhile, the proceedings were being held with a different set of police guards after the integrity of the members of an elite police unit guarding the court was questioned last week.

This came after some of them were accused of influencing Luphondo into making an alleged confession of his part in the kidnapping, attempted murder, and drug dealing case.

On Thursday, prosecutor Louis Mashiane began a trial-within-a-trial when he asked the court to accept a statement from Luphondo, which was made shortly after his arrest in November.

The matter would be dealt with during Monday's proceedings.

Krejcir and his co-accused have all pleaded not guilty to the charges against them.

They allegedly recruited a man known as Doctor Nkosi to help smuggle 25kg of tik (methamphetamine) to Australia.

He worked for a cargo company at OR Tambo International Airport and allegedly disappeared with the shipment.

Krejcir and his co-accused allegedly kidnapped and tortured his brother Lukhele in a bid to have him reveal his sibling's whereabouts.

Nkosi has also testified in the trial where he confessed to stealing the drugs.

The trial continues. - Sapa


sign up
 
 

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.