NPA to study Mpisane case

Shauwn Mpisane leaving court with her husband, S'bu, shortly after the charges of fraud, forgery and uttering were withdrawn against her in the Durban Commercial Crime Court. Photo: Puri Devjee

Shauwn Mpisane leaving court with her husband, S'bu, shortly after the charges of fraud, forgery and uttering were withdrawn against her in the Durban Commercial Crime Court. Photo: Puri Devjee

Published Jan 16, 2014

Share

Durban - The NPA will examine the State's decision to withdraw corruption and fraud charges against Durban businesswoman Shauwn Mpisane, it said on Thursday.

“National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Mxolisi Nxasana instructed the head of the special commercial crimes unit to submit a detailed report for his consideration with the view to establish whether the reasons for the withdrawal warrant his intervention in a form of a review or not,” said National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesman Nathi Mncube.

Mpisane faced more than 50 charges of fraud, forgery, and uttering of a forged document.

She was accused of submitting forged documents to obtain Construction Industry Development Board gradings, which were then used to win five public works department tenders worth R140 million.

The State dropped charges against Mpisane on Wednesday in the Durban Commercial Crimes Court.

KwaZulu-Natal NPA spokeswoman Natasha Ramkisson-Kara said the withdrawal was because the State could not submit a forensic investigation report to the court by Wednesday afternoon.

Mncube said Nxasana had noted the public's outrage at the State's decision to withdraw the criminal case.

“The NPA will inform the public on the next course of action in this matter once the NDPP has applied his mind on the matter,” he said.

The report by the special commercial crimes unit was expected to reach the NDPP's office Monday.

Mpisane still faces charges in two other cases. In the Durban Regional Court she is accused of inflating invoices of her business Ä Zikhulise Cleaning, Maintenance, and Transport CC Ä by almost R5m to cut her tax bill.

In the Pinetown Magistrate's Court she stands accused of interfering with a State witness related to the tax fraud case.

The lead prosecutor in those two cases has been removed and the NDPP will inform the courts on January 31 whether the cases will proceed following representations by Mpisane's lawyers about the prosecution's conduct.

Mpisane's legal team has accused the prosecution of suppressing evidence.

Sapa

Related Topics: