O'Sullivan wants prosecutor investigated

(File photo) Forensic investigator, Paul O'Sullivan. Picture: Itumeleng English

(File photo) Forensic investigator, Paul O'Sullivan. Picture: Itumeleng English

Published Aug 10, 2016

Share

Johannesburg - Forensic consultant Paul O'Sullivan has called on the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to investigate the conduct of the lawyer in charge of prosecuting him for breaching the Citizenship Act.

O'Sullivan was arrested at OR Tambo International Airport in April and accused of breaching the act. He had used his foreign passports to travel in and out of the country despite the fact that he is also a South African citizen. O'Sullivan remains the first person in South Africa to be arrested for this relatively minor and lesser-known crime.

While O'Sullivan admits to the action, he has pleaded not guilty on all six charges of contravening the act over the past year-and-a-half.

O'Sullivan, through his advocate Barry Roux, has argued that not only was he ignorant of the illegality of his actions, but also that the reason for using his foreign passports was to fly under the radar after allegedly receiving death threats from Czech fugitive Radovan Krejcir.

Last week, the State brought into question magistrate Wynand Nel's conduct.

The prosecutor, advocate Jabulani Mlotshwa, claimed the presiding officer had shown bias by relaxing O'Sullivan's bail conditions and allegedly conferring with the consultant's lawyer, Darryl Furman, outside court proceedings.

But Mlotshwa's recusal application failed on Friday, after the magistrate insisted he would remain neutral on proceedings.

Nel said his decision to relax the bail conditions was because O'Sullivan had never missed any of his court appearances and there was no proof he was a flight risk, as the State had alleged.

Regarding the conversation with Furman, Nel said he had simply informed the lawyer of an issue with the interpreter, a very brief conversation. He, therefore, refused to recuse himself.

In a letter sent to National Director of Public Prosecutions Shaun Abrahams, O'Sullivan and Furman have approached the NPA, calling for a review of Mlotshwa's allegedly illegal conduct during the recusal application.

Mlotshwa allegedly made deliberate false written representations to the court, particularly when the advocate accused the magistrate of having prematurely sided with O'Sullivan.

"Since Mlotshwa's criminal conduct has also grossly affected my constitutional right to a fair trial, as well as massive financial prejudice, I request an urgent investigation into this matter," wrote O'Sullivan in an affidavit attached to the complaint.

Attempts to contact the NPA for comment on whether a probe would be launched were unsuccessful on Tuesday.

O'Sullivan's trial will continue in September, while he is also set to appear in the Randburg Magistrate's Court for a separate fraud case later in August.

Related Topics: