Road rage

All the news about the e-tolling saga...

State did not initiate Bees Roux deal

Comment on this story


bees roux_

INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS

Former Blue Bulls rugby player Bees Roux. Photo: Masi Losi

The state did not initiate the deal that saw former Blue Bulls rugby player Jacobus “Bees” Roux being ordered to pay R750 000 to the family of the metro police officer who was killed in a fight with him in August last year.

The National Director of the Public Prosecutions, advocate Menzi Simelane, said on Friday during a lecture at the University of Pretoria that Roux had contacted metro police officer Sergeant Ntshimane Johannes Mogale’s family and initially made an offer of R250 000.

This was then increased to R750 000 and according to Simelane the wife of Mogale had written to him asking him to accept the deal.

Roux was charged with the murder after beating Mogale, 38, to death.

The incident took place after Mogale apparently pulled Roux over for allegedly driving under the influence of alcohol.

Roux said in an affidavit placed before court during his bail application that he had assaulted Mogale while defending himself against theft and attempted robbery by Mogale, and that he would plead not guilty to a murder charge.

Simelane said that his office had simply requested that R750 000 become an order of the court in case Roux reneged on his offer to the family.

Roux, he said, was happy for it to become an order of the court.

Simelane said the biggest difficulty for the prosecution was whether to pursue a case of murder against Roux.

State witnesses had told police that the moment Roux had noticed that Mogale was no longer moving he had sought to assist him and called an ambulance.

“His behaviour suggested someone who did not have intention (to murder). So our own state witnesses that we were going to lead (in court) to prove a (murder) case against him were arguing a (culpable homicide) case that we weren’t arguing.”

He said that it would have been difficult for the state to successfully argue in favour of a prison sentence for Roux on a culpable homicide conviction.

Apart from the R750 000 being an order of the court, Roux was given a five-year suspended sentence on charges of culpable homicide and drunken driving by Judge Nomonde Mngqibisa-Thusi. - Sapa

sign up

Share |  

Facebook icon

Facebook

Twitter icon

Twitter

Google icon

Google

Yahoo icon

Yahoo

Reddit icon

Reddit

del.icio.us icon

del.icio.us

Pinterest icon

Pinterest

Email

Print

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (0 votes) 0 Stars

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)

aNON, wrote

IOL Comments
08:26am on 24 October 2011
IOL Comments

this matter was very simple...the state did not have much of a case, state witnesses would have favoured roux story, roux assisted the beaten policemean who he alledges attempted to car jack him, the cost of the trial to the state would have been huge, the cost of the trial to roux would have exceeded R1m, roux was suspected of being drunk but no tests were done, roux offers financial settlement to family in lieu of fighting the charges that he could quite well have won but at great expense over a long period of time and kiss good bye his rugby career. the matter was never tested in court but settled on admission of guilt, no evidence led! the settlement is a no brainer and a win win for tax payers and ex policeman's family.

Report this

IOL Comments

ss, wrote

IOL Comments
06:44pm on 21 October 2011
IOL Comments

WHOOHOOO BEES JOU OU DORING !!!!!

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
06:34pm on 21 October 2011
IOL Comments

Dear @A you've just read an article where Simelane explains why they would have not been able to win a murder trial yet you manage to read around that. Yet you seem to know something more then the states eye witness. Are you dim or something?

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
06:09pm on 21 October 2011
IOL Comments

Anonymous, we must be related. But if you want to talk about excess, is there any reason to shout? I suspect you have legal training that qualifies you to make such a vehement pronouncement on the scant facts that have graced the media. Well done. This country needs more like you.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
05:46pm on 21 October 2011
IOL Comments

If you read the story the accused never left anyone to die but according to the prosecution offered assistance and was the one who called an ambulance....A bulls front rower is not usually the sharpest tool in the shed but trying to rob a drunk one is even more stupid!

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
05:21pm on 21 October 2011
IOL Comments

Beating a a man once to stop him in is probably ok. Beating a man to death on SUSPICION that the said man is trying rob you is EXCESSIVE. Leaving him to die is MURDER.

Report this

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 6 of 6

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks
IOL-Social networks

Mobile
on m.iol.co.za

IOL-Social networks

Newsletters
Subscribe

IOL-Social networks

RSS feeds
Subscribe

Business Directory