Road rage

All the news about the e-tolling saga...

Dismay over pay, perks of politicians


zuma sep 21

INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS

President Jacob Zuma. Photo: Dumisani Sibeko

Politicians face a “rising tide of criticism” over their salaries – and the perks that come with their jobs – causing citizens to question their integrity, the Independent Commission for the Remuneration of Public Office Bearers has warned.

The commission has released its long-awaited recommendations on what constitutes acceptable “tools of trade” – resources required by public office-bearers to perform their duties – and how and by whom these benefits should be managed.

It said suitably qualified individuals would avoid seeking public office “when the ethical compass of public office-bearers is subject to challenge”.

“The provision of tools of trade costs the state money and the current exact value of the tools of trade is not possible to quantify as the public office-bearers’ institutions do not track or account properly for (them),” the commission noted.

On Tuesday, Parliament approved a 5 percent salary increase for President Jacob Zuma, bringing his annual package to about R2.48 million.

Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe is to be paid out the presidential pension due to him since he made way for President Jacob Zuma in May 2009, but will “repay” the salary he has earned as Zuma’s deputy.

In effect, he will receive only the difference between what he has earned as deputy president and the higher amount due as his presidential pension. But he will not be earning a salary and receiving a pension.

The commission recently recommended an increase of 5 percent for all public office-bearers. This has been approved by Zuma.

The recommendations also come amid revelations about questionable spending by several politicians.

Recent examples include:

* International Relations and Co-operation Minister Maite Nkoane-Mashabane’s spending nearly R240 000 to charter a jet in Norway after she missed her scheduled flight because she refused to have her handbag X-rayed by airport security.

* Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs Sicelo Shiceka’s blowing R370 000 on a trip to Switzerland to visit his girlfriend, who was in jail on drug-related charges, and R280 000 on a short stay at the exclusive One&Only hotel in Cape Town.

* Public Works Minister Gwen Mahlangu-Nkabinde’s approving the purchase of 17 ministerial homes for Zuma’s expanded cabinet at a cost of R183m to the taxpayer.

* Communications Minister Roy Padayachie’s racking up a car rental bill of R1.2m when he was deputy minister of public administration.

A common theme in these cases is that the spending was said to be within the limits set by the Ministerial Handbook. The handbook contains detailed regulations on the tools of trade applicable for senior politicians.

The commission noted this fact, but suggested that this argument “challenges the appropriateness of those guidelines in the first place”.

Following a public outcry in 2009 over similar splurges, the government undertook to review the handbook – a process that was to have been completed by June last year.

In April, 10 months later, Minister of Public Service and Administration Richard Baloyi said the new handbook would be published “soon, very soon”.

Baloyi said on Tuesday “we have started the process” of reviewing the handbook. But he said the job could not be completed until the commission had made its recommendations on tools of trade. He would meet the commission “soon” to discuss how its recommendations should be incorporated into the handbook.

Commission secretariat chief Peter Makapan said:

“The minister sent a draft of the revised handbook to the commission to get our input. The handbook was discussed at our last meeting on Saturday. When the cabinet reviews the handbook, it will have to consider our recommendations.”

The commission has made only broad recommendations. The details of what ministers may spend on houses, cars, official entertainment, office equipment, travel, staff and other tools of trade will again be left to the cabinet it seems.

Nevertheless, the commission’s recommendations contain a golden thread urging greater transparency and accountability by politicians.

Recently, members of the executive, citing “security” concerns, have refused to answer MPs’ questions about travel and subsistence expenses.

Significantly, the commission singled out “travelling facilities”, saying they should be managed in “the most cost-effective manner”. - Political Bureau

sign up

Share |  

Facebook icon

Facebook

Twitter icon

Twitter

Google icon

Google

Yahoo icon

Yahoo

Reddit icon

Reddit

del.icio.us icon

del.icio.us

Pinterest icon

Pinterest

Email

Print

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (5 votes) 3 Stars

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
04:08pm on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

R2.4mil? Really? The evidence says different. Is that Zuma's before additional tax benefit salary. Does it include the cost of maintaining the first ladies and the tribe of first children? Perhaps we should be given a detailed account of how the tax budget is blown every year and then we can make our own conclusions about actual cost of government as opposed to net benefit to tax payer. I do not feel the effects of my tax money so the benefit to me is zero.

IOL Comments

Hangmann, wrote

IOL Comments
04:05pm on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

I agree with Ralph too, to much time is spent reading the "acceptable guide lines" and working out how to milk as much out of it as possible instead of working.

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
02:05pm on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Re-write the Ministerial Handbook and let the people approve it in a referendum.

IOL Comments

Roger, wrote

IOL Comments
11:38am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Really agree with Ralf they all the dept heads needs to do a performance appraisal of relevant staff members in order to see that standards are upheld and if staff members are entitled to bonusses and increases this will gaurantee productiveness! Thanks Ralf

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
11:26am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

No skills, education, experience required. Thats why they fight so much for positions amongst themselves. Easy way to "better life for me"

IOL Comments

Michal, wrote

IOL Comments
11:14am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Together we can do more - steal, rob, corrupt... African National Corruption; and this is what you all voted for?

IOL Comments

Ralf, wrote

IOL Comments
11:07am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Firstly all local, provincial and national government employees are grossly overpaid especially those from middle to top management. There should be zero perks and instead only a flat salary which they then can do whatever they like with, i.e. buy whatever car , house, clothing etc that they want as long as they use their own money. As they are not held accountable for anything they do, there should be no bonus system because they are being paid to do a job which they are never fired from even when they don't perform to the required standards, so therefore their bonus is that they will not be fired! If they want their pay packets to be compared to the private sector, then they need to perform like the private sector and get disciplined and fired for non-performance, unlike the current situation where either nothing is done about non-performance or alternatively the non-performers are moved to another department with no drop in salary so that they can continue not performing in that new department. If they want to be paid like the private sector, then they must go and work in the private sector or alternatively proper performance indicators need to be signed off and an external performance evaluation must then be performed and non-performers fired and black listed so that they are not re-employed in another department. Would they be happy with this? I think not! Also Zuma, where are these performance standards that all your ministers had to sign off and be judged against? Suddenly all is very quiet on this issue and why, because every single one of your ministers starting with you would have been fired for incompetence long ago, if you had to enforce this system.

IOL Comments

Dukie 743, wrote

IOL Comments
10:45am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Anonymous @ 10.09 am--- It is not only the ANC MPS that is receiving lucrative pay rises and are looting the state coffers. All of these parasites from ALL political parties are receiving and looting. Their greed knows no bounds. The politicians in South Africa through their absolute greed, are set the ignite a rebellion in South Africa that will make the recent Libyan rebellion and the French revolution of the 18th century, lokke like a picnic in the park in comparison. The politicians in South Africa are out of contol with their plundering of the state coffers.

IOL Comments

fed up, wrote

IOL Comments
10:29am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Well All you ANC supporters well done here we have the chosen one who suppose to see to your poor needs is getting all the credit so that he can support his 5 wives and 21 kids.While our poor get poorer and the rich just gets fatter. Next election first think who you vote for because we need someone who see's to the needs of his people before his pocket. If he was a good president he would turn this down and contribute towards the poor, recently there has been so many crimes on our children and people , have you asked why ? because criminals have easy access to the shack dwellers look at the recent abuse and murder of the 2 girls, why doesn't JZ rather contribute in helping these people rather , Well right from the top of the ANC rule to the bottom every one is corrupt. Take Youth League "P" Juluis M what an example and by the way he is 36yrs old and not 26

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
10:09am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

For those that voted for the ANC is this what you voted for???

IOL Comments

LordXerxses, wrote

IOL Comments
09:55am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Obama earns 400 000 per year.

IOL Comments

Juan, wrote

IOL Comments
09:52am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Fine! Let them blow money on luxury houses and cars while their own people live in shacks and go to bed cold and hungry. By all means: Do it, but stop blaming apartheid and the white man for this mess!!

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
09:27am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

These ministers earn astronomical salaries and I might add paid by the taxpayer then they still spend more money on unnecessary things. The public are asked every budget announcement that we should tighten our belts. Some of the MP,s cannot even get a belt around their waists anymore.

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
09:25am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

It is a load of rubbish that these politicians have to be paid market related salaries. They would not even get a cleaners job had they to go and apply for a job in the private sector. They are totaly useless! The only value they have is their tenderpreneurs connections and that they got because of their positions. No ability required except "fraud"

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
09:20am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Our system of appointing party parasites should be changed to a system (like the USA) where we can elect our own choices who will then be forced to produce. I pity SA and the 70% unknowing voters. They are sure to be very upset when they wake up too late to nothing.

IOL Comments

kurt, wrote

IOL Comments
09:18am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

this is an excuse to waste money and not be accountable. it is a disgrace and should be declared as TREASON.

IOL Comments

Dukie 743, wrote

IOL Comments
09:12am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

The most junior, uneducated, unqualified member of parliment of ALL political parties now receives a salary of R90,000 PER MONTH. plus massive perks, which takes them to be the hoghest paid group of people in the country and perhaps the world. According to a survey some months ago, the average working South African receives a YEARLY salary of less than R50,000 and no perks. Do you notice how these parasite politicians of ALL political parties stick together like glue when it comes to their salaries and perks. They are all buddies and only out to loot and enrich themselves at tax payers espense.

IOL Comments

Kevin, wrote

IOL Comments
09:13am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Parliamentary salaries are problematic because they are paid to people who are not qualified for the job who are not appointed by their employer and who do not have face performance appraisals. They are not held to account for malfeasance and misuse of their employers assets. In the private sector they would be subject to all of the forgoing. Their performance in Parliament is pathetic, most of them make no contribution to the formation of law in the country other than to do what they are told by the party whips. They are all significantly overpaid in the South African context. All one has to do is look at the skills and experience required to earn R50 000 pm in the private sector and it is apparent that our members of parliament are significantly overpaid.

IOL Comments

Confucius, wrote

IOL Comments
09:10am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Over the last 17 years a few speed records have been broken. Our tax monies disappear just as quickly as they were increased.

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
09:01am on 21 September 2011
IOL Comments

Why can't we vote for a President in our democracy the same as other countries in Africa. Is it a privilege or a democratic right ?

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 20 of 31

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks
IOL-Social networks

Mobile
on m.iol.co.za

IOL-Social networks

Newsletters
Subscribe

IOL-Social networks

RSS feeds
Subscribe

Business Directory