King Zwelithini 'did not call for violence'

King Goodwill Zwelithini "did not actively incite violence but engendered discrimination" during a speech on moral regeneration. File picture: Motshwari Mofokeng

King Goodwill Zwelithini "did not actively incite violence but engendered discrimination" during a speech on moral regeneration. File picture: Motshwari Mofokeng

Published Sep 30, 2016

Share

Johannesburg - Although Zulu King Goodwill Zwelithini’s utterances were harmful to foreign nationals, he did not call for violence against migrants, an investigation by the SA Human Rights Commission has found.

Commission chairman Lawrence Mushwana on Friday told a media briefing that Zwelithini’s utterances, made during a speech he delivered at a meeting on moral regeneration in Pongola, KwaZulu-Natal in March last year, did not actively incite violence but engendered discrimination.

“From an analysis of the utterances of the respondent in the transcribed version of his speech, the commission is of the view that at no point did the respondent issue a call to take arms or any call for violent attack against migrants,” Mushwana told reporters in Johannesburg.

“His utterances fall short of incitement to violence as he did not actively encourage or pressurise the audience into committing violent acts against migrants.”

He said, however, that Zwelithini’s statement created an environment in which foreign nationals could be discriminated against by society.

“Telling people that they’re criminals and that they’re here to steal the country’s wealth is harmful. Such psychological conditioning could ultimately lead to acts of discrimination and fuel a climate which leads to violence against migrants.”

In his speech, Zwelithini accused foreign nationals of making “streets dirty”. He also called on foreign nationals to pack their bags and go home. Mushwana said a Zulu language expert who assisted the commission in its probe, concluded that these statements did not incite violence.

“In the history of the Zulu nation, the king can express his views in a blunt and sometimes crude way without meaning to offend a particular individual. In regard to request for ‘foreign nationals and their luggage to be sent back home’ the expert found that the reference to luggage is made on the assumption that hawkers are in South Africa illegally,” said Mushwana.

The complaint against the king was laid by African Diaspora Forum, Lawyers for Human Rights and other individuals. They charged that Zwelithini’s statement incited violence against foreign nationals and had resulted in an eruption of xenophobic attacks that started in KwaZulu-Natal last year.

Seven people were killed and thousands displaced last year as violence against foreign nationals swept through large parts of the country.

Mushwana said Zwelithini had during his speech also criticised locals for inflicting violence on foreign nationals.

“Unfortunately, this aspect of the king’s speech was not covered in the media reports regarding the speech.”

Zwelithini had argued that he was quoted out of context through “inaccurate reporting” and that the media did not understand the Zulu language.

He asked the commission to investigate the media reports for its role in “misusing and abusing” the speech he delivered.

Mushwana said although Zwelithini did not point to specific media reports, the commission was not the best placed institution to investigate his complaint. The Press Ombudsman was the correct platform to address the king’s concerns, he said.

African News Agency

Related Topics: