Afghan poll dispute delays inauguration

Comment on this story
iol pic wld_AFGHANISTAN-ELECTION-ABDULLAH Reuters Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah waves to his supporters during a gathering in Kabul. File picture: Omar Sobhani

Kabul - Afghanistan's next president was meant to be inaugurated on Monday but the deadline has been pushed back to September 2 as rival candidates remain deadlocked over who won an election meant to mark the troubled country's first democratic transfer of power.

Rivals Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani, as part of a US-brokered deal, must form a government of national unity and co-operate on an audit of all eight million votes that were cast to eliminate concerns over widespread electoral fraud.

The inauguration had to be pushed back a second time since a June run-off vote because officials from both camps, along with the electoral body, doubted the target would be met.

The new inauguration target of September 2, if it is met, would allow the next president to take power before a key NATO summit in Wales starts two days later. The summit will determine how much aid Afghanistan will get after most foreign troops pull out at the end of the year.

“The Independent Election Commission (IEC) is trying very hard to finish the process as soon as possible,” said the commission's spokesman, Noor Mohammad Noor.

The bitter stand-off has dashed hopes for a smooth transition of power from President Hamid Karzai, who has run Afghanistan since US-backed Afghan forces toppled the Taliban in 2001. He is barred by the constitution from running again.

Noor said 70 percent of votes have been inspected so far, a month into the UN-supervised audit, but the most contentious ballots have yet to be scrutinised.

“Prolonging of the presidential process has affected people's daily life, particularly in security, economy and governance,” Karzai's office said on Sunday after a meeting with the candidates to urge them to cooperate.

“This must end as soon as possible.”

Results from the June 14 run-off put Ghani, a former World Bank official, in the lead. Abdullah rejected the result, accusing his rival's team of rigging the election with Karzai's help. Ghani and Karzai have denied the charge.

The IEC was due to start invalidating votes later on Monday, a process that will determine how many votes are thrown out based on findings submitted by hundreds of auditors.

A commission appointed by members of both camps has been meeting for days to work out a political solution but they have made little progress so far.

“They tried to narrow the differences down and find some common ground... but they could not agree,” said Abdullah's spokesman, Mujib Rahman Rahimi.

“The two camps are representing two different philosophies.”

Rahimi could not say for sure whether the new deadline for inaugurating the next president would be met.

“Honestly, I cannot come out with something definite on that, but I hope. It's Afghanistan. Things are unpredictable.”

Ghani's team declined official comment. One of his campaign officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said little progress had been made interpreting the framework for a power-sharing deal.

“Nothing yet has added to the political framework and the commission couldn't reach an agreement in most of the areas (discussed),” the official said, adding that the candidates were meeting to try to break the deadlock. - Reuters

sign up

Comment Guidelines

  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

  5. Verified email addresses: All users on Independent Media news sites are now required to have a verified email address before being allowed to comment on articles. You are only required to verify your email address once to have full access to commenting on articles. For more information please read our comment guidelines