Start making sense of your financial wellness.

Watch the Sitholes every Thursday at 17h30 on e.tv

Cops to review LA clergy abuse files

Comment on this story


iol pic wld California Church Abuse~1

AP

In this February 9, 2005 file photo, Archbishop Jose H Gomez greets parishioners following an Ash Wednesday service at Mission San Jose in San Antonio, Texas.

Los Angeles -

Detectives will review recently released clergy abuse files from the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles to see if there's evidence of criminal activity by church authorities, including failure to report child abuse to law enforcement, police officials said on Tuesday.

Investigators will focus on the cases of about a dozen previously investigated priests and are auditing those past probes to make sure nothing was missed, said Commander Andrew Smith. The department will also look at the files for all 122 priests that were made public Thursday by court order after the archdiocese fought for five years to keep them sealed, he said.

Thousands of pages of secret confidential files kept by the archdiocese on priests accused of molesting children show recently retired Cardinal Roger Mahony and other top archdiocese officials shielded priests to protect the church, thwarted police investigations and repeatedly did not report child sex abuse to the authorities.

The files of another 14 priests were published by the Los Angeles Times and The Associated Press last month and revealed a similar cover-up.

“Now what's being alleged is a failure to report, those kinds of things, so there's a new emphasis - it's not just the person that's accused of the behaviour, but if it's also if it was not properly reported,” said Deputy Chief Kirk Albanese, who heads the detective bureau.

“We're taking a fresh look on cases we've already handled to make sure we don't have reporting issues that got past,” he said.

Michael Hennigan, an archdiocese attorney, declined to comment on Tuesday.

Mahony, who retired in 2011 as head of the largest US diocese, was publicly rebuked on Friday by his successor, Archbishop Jose Gomez.

The same day, Bishop Thomas Curry, a top Mahony aide who made critical decisions on abusive priests, requested to resign from his post as an auxiliary bishop in charge of the archdiocese's Santa Barbara region. Curry was vicar for clergy in the mid-1980s, a position created to handle priestly discipline and other personnel issues.

Both Mahony and Curry have publicly apologised for their handling of paedophile priests.

The archdiocese is considering launching a $200 million fundraising campaign in the midst of the fallout from the clergy files, the Los Angeles Times reported on Tuesday. A recent financial report indicates the archdiocese has a deficit of nearly $80m.

The LAPD is right to review the files for new information, but it's unlikely anything they find will fall within the statute of limitations in state or federal court, said Rebecca Lonergan, a former federal prosecutor and a professor at the University of Southern California's Gould School of Law.

The statute of limitations on most crimes that would apply to the priest cases is three years under state law and five years under federal law, she said.

Prosecutors could try to prove an ongoing conspiracy among members of the church hierarchy to cover up for abusive priests, but under federal law even that would require proof of criminal activity over a long period of time with one specific criminal act occurring within the past five years, she said.

Clergy were not mandated child abuse reporters until 1997, and by then, the archdiocese had implemented significant changes in how it dealt with reports of paedophile priests.

“You have to show that at least two parties were in this together the entire time and that's going to be really hard,” Lonergan said. “Most of the documents that have been revealed are bad and show concealment, but they're really old. There's none that show this is going on within the past few years, in the late 2000s.”

Prosecutors have previously investigated the archdiocese for its handling of sex abuse cases, but no criminal charges were ever filed against members of the hierarchy.

Also on Tuesday, a support group for clergy abuse victims called for the Los Angeles Unified School District to thoroughly investigate how the district hired a former priest who allegedly had a sexual relationship with a minor.

Joseph Pina, who was never convicted of a crime, was hired in 2002 as a community outreach coordinator for the district's school construction campaign, said Tom Waldman, the district's spokesman. The archdiocese told the Los Angeles Times that it warned the district about Pina, but the LAUSD can't find any indication of that in its files, Waldman said on Tuesday.

“We're looking into how this happened, but so far we haven't found the document that the archdiocese indicated it sent to us,” he said. “Whether or not we called them as a reference, I don't know.”

The former priest worked with adults only, was never alone with children and had no complaints during his time there, Waldman said. -

Sapa-AP


sign up
 
 

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

     

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks

Business Directory