Tehran - Iran will target any country used as a launchpad for attacks against its soil, the deputy Revolutionary Guards commander said, expanding Tehran's range of threats in an increasingly volatile stand-off with world powers over its nuclear ambitions.
Last week, Iran's supreme clerical leader threatened reprisals for the West's new ban on Iranian oil exports and the US defence secretary was quoted as saying Israel was likely to bomb Iran within months to stop it assembling nuclear weapons.
Although broadened and sharpened financial sanctions have begun to inflict serious economic pain in Iran, its oil minister asserted on Saturday it would make no nuclear retreat even if its crude oil exports ground to a halt.
Iran says its nuclear programme is for civilian energy purposes. But its recent shift of uranium enrichment to a mountain bunker possibly impervious to conventional bombing, and refusal to negotiate peaceful guarantees for the programme or open up to United Nations nuclear inspectors, have thickened an atmosphere of brewing confrontation, raising fears for Gulf oil supplies.
“Any spot used by the enemy for hostile operations against Iran will be subjected to retaliatory aggression by our armed forces,” Hossein Salami, deputy head of the elite Revolutionary Guards, told the semi-official Fars news agency on Sunday.
The Guards began two days of military manoeuvres in southern Iran on Saturday in another show of force for Iran's adversaries associated with tensions over its disputed nuclear programme.
On Sunday Israel appointed a new air force chief who last month, in his position as top military planner, warned publicly that Israel could not deal a knock-out blow to its enemies, including Iran, in any regional conflict.
The United States and Israel, Iran's arch-enemies, have not ruled out a military strike on Tehran if diplomacy fails to resolve the nuclear stalemate. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu plans to visit Washington next month, his office said on Sunday, and Israeli political sources said he is likely to meet US President Barack Obama while there.
Iran's Salami did not identify which countries he meant as possible hosts for military action against it.
The six, US-allied Arab states in the Gulf Co-operation Council, situated on the other side of the vital oil exporting waterway from Iran, have said they would not allow their territories to be used for attacks on the Islamic Republic.
But analysts say that if Iran retaliated for an attack launched from outside the region by targeting US facilities in Gulf Arab states, Washington might pressure the host nations to permit those bases to hit back, arguing they should have the right to defend themselves.
The Gulf states that host US military facilities are Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait.
Iran has warned its response to any such strike will be “painful”, threatening to target Israel and US bases in the Gulf, along with closing the Strait of Hormuz used by one third of the world's seaborne oil traffic.
Betraying nervousness about possible blowback from any military strike on Iran, two of its neighbours - Qatar and Turkey - urged the West on Sunday to make greater efforts to negotiate a solution to the nuclear row.
Speaking at the annual Munich Security Conference attended by top world policymakers, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said an attack would be a “disaster” and the dispute over Iran's nuclear programme could be ended very rapidly.
“If there is strong political will and mutual confidence being established, this issue could be resolved in a few days,” he said. “The technical disputes are not so big. The problem is mutual confidence and strong political will.”
He added: “A military option will create a disaster in our region. So before that disaster, everybody must be serious in negotiations. We hope soon both sides will meet again but this time there will be a complete result.”
Turkey was the venue of the last talks between Western powers and Iran a year ago which ended in stalemate because participants could not even agree on an agenda.
Qatari Deputy Foreign Minister Khalid Mohamed al-Attiyah said an attack “is not a solution, and tightening the embargo on Iran will make the scenario worse”.
“I believe that with our allies and friends in the West we should open a serious dialogue with the Iranians to get out of this dilemma. This is what we feel in our region.”
Tehran has warned several times it may seal off the Strait of Hormuz, throttling the supply of Gulf crude and gas, if attacked or if sanctions mean it cannot export its oil. - Reuters
|
|
StupidDoos, wrote
Peter Funda: Ok, so what you are saying is that Iran's progress should be dictated by others. Why can't Iran be a supplier of fuel rods to other countries? You don't seem to see the hypocrisy in the fact that the most vocal opposition of Iran is the biggest violator of the NPT and the only country to have used the A-bomb on people.
Thabiso, wrote
Third World War coming through, USA the instigator. I doubt if Iran will give up its nuclear programme,and we know how the USA think they run the world as every demand they make must be met. USA goes at every country except fro Russia of course...
Peter Funda, wrote
@Flemza, you have the right to view, and the freedom to make it heard. But please, blasphemy is not need to emphasis your point.
Peter Funda, wrote
As said before, no one is objecting to Iran having nuclear power. They are free to build SAFE nuclear power stations (any Chernobyl like accidents they make will negatively impact themselves and all their neighbours)... But there is no reason why they can't just buy fuel rods for those plants (JUST like we do for Koeberg!). As the only country which has truly earned our NPT treaty membership, I can not see how any S.African can support Iran's effort to obtain nuclear weapons. 'Cheap' oil is not worth it.
Flemza, wrote
For the sake of peace for once all the wars in the world the US & Israel they are at the centre of Arab world descruction , please leave Iran alone , havent the US seen enough , a decade ago it was Iraq , until today there is no peace in Iraq , why can US stop Israel nuclear weapons if they are serious about word peace , if Israel make peace with the Palestians , who is Iran going to use the nuclear against , just leave Iran alone , Africa need cheap petrol for Christ sake
democrat, wrote
Turkey says a military strike 'would be a disaster in our region'. It would be a lot more than that, methinks. It would undoubtedly bring in Russia and (with the state of things in Syria) it would in effect trigger the Third World War.
Showing items 1 - 6 of 6
Services
Business Directory
Comment Guidelines