US Abu Ghraib torture case revived

Comment on this story
iol news pic Lady Justice by Mike Cogh Mike [email protected] File image

Richmond, Virginia - A federal appeals court on Monday revived a lawsuit against CACI International Inc, in which the defense contractor's employees were accused of directing the torture of detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad.

The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said a lower court judge erred in concluding he lacked jurisdiction to hear claims by four Iraqi plaintiffs because the alleged incidents occurred in Iraq.

Monday's decision has the potential to expand legal liability for contractors who work with and undertake sensitive tasks on behalf of US troops outside the country.

CACI employees had conducted interrogation and other services at Abu Ghraib. In the lawsuit, they were accused of directing or encouraging torture in 2003 and 2004, and managers were accused of covering it up.

At issue was the Alien Tort Statute, a 1789 US law often used to pursue claims over human rights abuses in US courts.

While the US Supreme Court narrowed the law's reach in 2013, Circuit Judge Barbara Milano Keenan wrote for a three-judge 4th Circuit panel that the Iraqi plaintiffs' claims “touch and concern” the United States enough to let them go forward.

iol news pic Abu Ghraib torture An Iraqi prisoner and American military dog handlers are shown in this photograph from a set of photographs that the New Yorker Magazine acquired. According to a time sequence embedded in the digital files, the photographs were taken by two different cameras over a twelve-minute period on the evening of December 12, 2003, two months after the military-police unit was assigned to Abu Ghraib. REUTERS/Courtesy of The New Yorker REUTERS

Keenan also said Congress has a “distinct interest” in not turning the United States into a “safe harbor” for torturers.

The 4th Circuit did not rule on the claims' merits. It returned the case to US District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee in Alexandria, Virginia, who had dismissed it in June 2013.

CACI is based in Arlington, Virginia. The company and its law firm were not immediately available for comment.

Baher Azmy, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, was also not immediately available.

Photos depicting the abuse of Abu Ghraib detainees emerged in 2004. Some detainees claimed they endured physical and sexual abuse, infliction of electric shocks, and mock executions.

Lee had ruled two months after the US Supreme Court, in a decision by Chief Justice John Roberts, said the Alien Tort Statute was presumed to cover conduct in the United States, and that violations elsewhere must “touch and concern” US territory “with sufficient force” before people could sue.

In finding that the alleged Abu Ghraib violations did, the 4th Circuit pointed to factors including CACI's having won US government permission to conduct interrogations and obtain security clearances, and allegations that CACI managers in the United States acquiesced in, or concealed, misconduct.

The appeals court said it could not decide whether the detainees' claims raised political questions beyond its purview, and directed Lee to review that issue.

The members of the 4th Circuit panel were appointed to their current positions by President Barack Obama.

The case is Al Shimari et al v. CACI Premier Technology Inc et al, 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-1937.


sign up

Comment Guidelines

  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

  5. Verified email addresses: All users on Independent Media news sites are now required to have a verified email address before being allowed to comment on articles. You are only required to verify your email address once to have full access to commenting on articles. For more information please read our comment guidelines