sxc.hu
London - It sounds like the stuff of science fiction dreams - or nightmares.
Scientists believe they have found a way to read our minds, using a computer program that can decode brain activity in our brains and put it into words.
They say it could offer a lifeline to those whose speech has been affected by stroke or degenerative disease, but many will be concerned about the implications of a technique that can eavesdrop on thoughts and reproduce them.
Neuroscientists at the University of California Berkeley put electrodes inside the skulls of brain surgery patients to monitor information from their temporal lobe, which is involved in the processing of speech and images.
As the patient listened to someone speaking, a computer program analysed how the brain processed and reproduced the words they had heard.
The scientists believe the technique could also be used to read and report what they were thinking of saying next.
In the journal PLoS Biology, they write that it takes attempts at mind reading to 'a whole new level'.
Robert Knight, professor of psychology and neuroscience, added: 'This is huge for patients who have damage to their speech mechanisms because of a stroke or Lou Gehrig’s [motor neurone] disease and can’t speak.
‘If you could eventually reconstruct imagined conversations from brain activity, thousands could benefit.’
The researchers tested 15 people who were already undergoing brain surgery to treat epilepsy or brain tumours.
They agreed to have up to 256 electrodes put on to the brain surface, as they listened to men and women saying individual words including nouns, verbs and names.
A computer programme analysed the activity from the electrodes, and reproduced the word they had heard or something very similar to it at the first attempt.
Co-author Brian Pasley said there is already mounting evidence that ‘perception and imagery may be pretty similar in the brain’.
Therefore with more work, brain recordings could allow scientists to ‘synthesise the actual sound a person is thinking, or just write out the words with a type of interface device.’
Their study also shows in sharp relief how the auditory system breaks down sound into its individual frequencies - a range of around 1 to 8,000 Hertz for human speech.
Pasley told ABC News: 'This study mainly focused on lower-level acoustic characteristics of speech. But I think there's a lot more happening in these brain areas than acoustic analysis'.
He added: 'We sort of take it for granted, the ability to understand speech. But your brain is doing amazing computations to accomplish this feat.'
This information does not change inside the brain but can be accurately mapped and the original sound decoded by a computer. British expert Professor Jan Schnupp, from Oxford University who was not involved in the study said it was ‘quite remarkable’.
‘Neuroscientists have of course long believed that the brain essentially works by translating aspects of the external world, such as spoken words, into patterns of electrical activity’, he said.
‘But proving that this is true by showing that it is possible to translate these activity patterns back into the original sound (or at least a fair approximation of it) is nevertheless a great step forward, and it paves the way to rapid progress toward biomedical applications.’
He played down fears it could lead to range of ‘mind reading’ devices as the technique can only, at the moment, be done on patients willing to have surgery.
Non-invasive brain scans are not powerful enough to read this level of information so it will remain limited to ‘small numbers of willing patients’.
He added: ‘Perhaps luckily for all those of us who value the privacy of their own thoughts, we can rest assured that our skulls will remain an impenetrable barrier for any would-be technological mind hacker for any foreseeable future.' - Daily Mail
|
|
Scam 2, wrote
Anonymous, wrote
Anonymous, wrote
Paul, wrote
Erich Honecker, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin (and many more!) would love to have such a machine. Big brother is watching us more and more. I say no to such computers.
Bobster, wrote
I made a comment the other day about the negative implications a hand held gene sequencer could have on rights of privacy and individuality. Wow! This one will take the cake. How long before you are wired up to a computer and instead of downloading your thoughts we will upload what we think you should think? And when will we be able to do this remotely? What about the thoughts of animals? Soon we will be able to put all the information and cognitive thinking in our brains onto a disc and dispense with this frail body we carry around. Ouch!
Meme-Man, wrote
Anonymous, wrote
@Meme-man - The evilutionists writing this article are planning on bringing the anti-Christ. This only proves the world is around 6000 years old. Your fantasies can only be reality through Jesus.
Meme-Man, wrote
There is a remote possibility that we'll be able to "download" and record the sum total of a person's memories, thoughts and aspirations - into... (??) a computer.... and ultimately back into (cloned?) living flesh - in the not-too-distant future. This, of course, means immortality. Of course, the hurdles are unimaginably vast. It may sound like science fiction, but the precedent does exist; I'll explain if anyone cares to hear. Watch this space....
Clive, wrote
victor, wrote
Showing items 1 - 10 of 10
Comment Guidelines