AP
In this file picture, Galen Kipe holds an electronic cigarette.
Berlin -
Concern is rising over the use of electronic cigarettes - or e-cigarettes - that produce an aerosol mist for inhaling rather than tobacco smoke and are used by many smokers to help kick the habit.
The small devices generally contain a rechargeable battery and an atomiser for vaporising a liquid intended to simulate some of the pleasures of smoking without the harmful effects. The potential risks involved and the precise contents of the liquids, along with their side-effects have been little researched. However, warnings are becoming increasingly loud, leading some countries to ban the devices.
“Consumers should be able to rely on a product that is safe from a health viewpoint and that is by no means certain in the case of the e-cigarette,” Martina Poetschke-Langer of the DKFZ German cancer research centre says. She cautions that lessons should be drawn from the mistakes of the past when promoting a new product.
“The standard cigarette caused millions of deaths over the course of the last century and would never have been allowed if we had known a hundred years ago what we know now,” she says.
The precise legal status of e-cigarettes is far from clear. Many US doctors back the device as an aid to stopping smoking, but across the border in Canada, the federal health authorities have come out against them. The British body Cancer Research UK sees them as safer than real cigarettes and possibly useful in breaking smoking dependence.
Germany's 16 states have taken differing approaches. “Things could be starting to move here. The states are talking about how to proceed in unison,” Poetschke-Langer says. But the trade is booming, with consumers in states where e-cigarettes are banned simply ordering them over the internet.
Barbara Steffens, health minister in Germany's most populous state of North Rhine-Westphalia, where they are banned, notes that, “Not everything on the market has been licensed and tested.” In her view, the liquids contain levels of nicotine that are so high that they need to be classified as medications and thus fall under the stringent provisions of the medications act.
Many questions remain. The e-cigarettes contain widely varying amounts of nicotine, which is a stimulant and relaxant, and is also highly addictive, along with aromas like chocolate-caramel and liquorice.
Consumer Alexandra Funck says she is aware of the controversy. “E-cigarettes don't contain all that muck. Sure, they're not healthy, but they're less harmful,” says the 42-year-old from Dusseldorf who is using the devices to quit smoking.
“You also don't have the butts and the ash. Your clothes don't stink and you don't irritate others,” said Funck, who is angry at the ban in her state of North Rhine-Westphalia. “Then you should ban normal cigarettes or sell them only through the pharmacies.”
While the producers insist their product is much less harmful than ordinary cigarettes, German doctors are not so sure, pointing to a study that reveals harmful effects on the bronchial passages. They blame the propylene glycol, an anti-freeze agent contained in the liquid, which makes up 90 per cent of the inhaled vapour.
Poetschke-Langer says the e-cigarette is likely to be just as addictive as the ordinary kind and notes that there is no good evidence that they assist in stopping smoking.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has found carcinogenic substances like nitrosamines in the liquid, and there is little clarity on whether there might be effects on “passive smokers” in the immediate environment of the e-smoker.
The product is banned in Norway, Turkey, Switzerland and even in China, where it was invented some 10 years ago. There are strict controls in Denmark, Canada and Austria, and the European Commission is probing the health effects. - Sapa-dpa
|
|
liz, wrote
Just a thought for you all concerning the effect of propylene glycol (PG) on your pets...cats in particular, are affected by this substance, it is very toxic for them and can cause renal failure and death, we of course can risk perhaps our own health in our hope of stubbing out the dreaded weed once and for all...but should be aware of the danger to our beloved pets...yes it is contained in the vapour we inhale AND exhale, therefore I switched to a 100% VG cartridge just to be on the safe side. The problem is that we just don't know for sure what is in these cartridges as most of them are exports from china, governments need to regulate these products and insist ingredients are listed and checked. PG is cheaper than VG lobby your e cig supplier to use VG!
Debbie, wrote
All you people keep talking about addiction. Do you drink coffee daily or have a few drinks after work? Then you too are "addicts"
Thad, wrote
"In her view, the liquids contain levels of nicotine that are so high that they need to be classified as medications and thus fall under the stringent provisions of the medications act." -- The nicotine content of e-cigarettes is comparable to the average commercial cigarette that has 1.63% (16mgg), but because e-cigarettes are not lit on fire to turn most of the nicotine into tar or lost to sidestream smoke, one cartridge can replace 10 or more combustible cigarettes without any of the fire hazards or smoke that causes more than 99% of the injuries, deaths, and diseases associated with tobacco use. "They blame the propylene glycol, an anti-freeze agent contained in the liquid, which makes up 90 per cent of the inhaled vapour." -- Research dating back as far as 1942 shows that propylene glycol vapor is a safe and effective germicide. The quantities used by even heavy users are so small (most average less than a teaspoon per day) that it might not have any significant or long term benefits, but no serious side effects have been reported in 70+ years. Propylene Glycol is classified "GRAS - Generally Regarded As Safe" by the FDA.
Smokee, wrote
Clearly things are booming there are a lot of companies out there and a lot of bad ones too. Hopefully they will self regulate and shake out over the coming years and the long arm of the government will not up and crush them. There is a lot of interesting conversation going on over at this blog-site concerning this somewhat emerging market.. http:www.smokee.comcategorysmokee-blog
Harold , wrote
Stewart, They wouldnt even approve my post because it exposes the truth about what is going on. Why a comment has to be approved is beyond me, but rest assured, it was the truth and they dont want you or anyone to know. Hence the non posting of my comments yesterday. Why even ask for comments if they are scared to publish them.
Dee, wrote
@stewart I think you are missing the point regarding the article and the point about the propylene glycol. They are saying that more research needs to be done. Just because something s generally considered safe for consumption, does not mean that it is automatically safe to be inhaledsmoked.
Stewart, wrote
I get real sick of hearing people get angry at vapers and smokers telling them to grow a pair or just do it. everyone's different. the patch worked for some people but most not. regardless most people can't fully commit to quitting. I had no withdrawals switching to Ecigs and I've never felt better. cigarettes taste like crap now. if I ever stop using Ecigs at least I know that what I relapse on will be tasty and wont stink up my life. and btw water is in anti freeze too so the scare tactic in journalism is getting old. propylene glycol is generally recognized as safe for consumption and the FDA with their overhyped analysis are corrupted through industry lobbyists in the dark.
Mr Elixir, wrote
After smoking for 25 years, I switched to electronic cigarettes 5 days ago. Already, my lung capacity has increased so much that I went jogging today. If there are any dangers with the e-cigs, they can't be close to the real thing. For anyone that is interested, I have started a blog to chart my journey from a 2 pack per day smoker to a healthier electronic cigarette smoker: http:mrelixir.blogspot.com
Anonymous, wrote
Ryan, wrote
@Mike Morgan Blatant advertising aside, I agree whole heartidly with your point. Besides for the dafe bit. Nothing in this world is safe and this bloody nanny state nonsense is starting to encroach on my human experience. This is not a "quit now" product it is an alternative for when I cannot smoke a real cig. It is ouderless and does not upset people around you. I like smoking... leave me be!
Cigarette électronique, wrote
Anonymous, wrote
I agree with anonymous and ex-smoker below. I just did my own research, and got a clear understanding of the chemicals contained in cigarettes, their negative effects on the human body, aging effects, total financial impact regarding cost of cigarettes as well as higher life insurance premiums, the foul smell that others get when you walk into a room after smoking, etc. After carefully contemplating these, I decided to quit and that was it. Quitting is wonderful. I feel better, my food tastes and smells better, skin feels refreshed, eyes don’t feel dry, I breathe a whole lot better, etc, etc. The most shocking think is when a smoker walks into the room after a smoke, and I think that is what I used to smell like but never realised it.
Anonymous, wrote
Knowing smokers (which I do since I was one for 15 years) and how they justify convince themselves of anything that will help them keep feeding their addiction to nicotine - this would probably just be a convenient replacement of the old stinky burning cigarettes. Like eating a drug instead of smoking - to avoid the social stigma and inconvenience. I know people who are addicted to nocorettes AND cigarettes - I too was one and had to increase my smoking so I could get off the exact thing that was supposed to help me stop smoking in the first place. The marketing is BS - they are just seeling a different version of NICOTINE which is a DRUG that is highly ADDICTIVE. Tell yourself what you want - the e-cigarette, nicorettes, patch etc etc all = BS. @ Ex smoke - totally agree!!!
Mike Morgan, wrote
Electronic cigarettes are just another option in what should be a free market as long as they are safe, which seems to be the case so far. See www.ecigwerks.blogspot.com for more.
Anonymous, wrote
it's all gimics... best way to quit is by doing it yourself. I went cold turkey after about 10 years of smoking, then took it up again out of stupidity, and after 2 years of that quit cold turkey again. I've not looked back since... it's been 2 years now.
Ex smoker, wrote
Tried them all, patches, gum, hypnosis and this electronic cigarette, nicotine substitution is still an addiction. I quit for over a year know, without any help. Just grow a pair and put it down smokers. I have never felt so good.
Showing items 1 - 16 of 16
Comment Guidelines