Increasing space junk: is Earth at risk?

Comment on this story


iol scitech nov 12 space junk

AFP

File photo: This artist's impression shows the debris field in low-Earth orbit (LEO) which extends to 2000 km above the Earth's surface which is based on actual data, not items in their actual size or density.

Paris - A build-up of carbon dioxide in the upper levels of Earth's atmosphere risks causing a faster accumulation of man-made space junk and resulting in more collisions, scientists said on Sunday.

While it causes warming on Earth, CO2 conversely cools down the atmosphere and contracts its outermost layer, the thermosphere, where many satellites including the International Space Station (ISS) operate, said a study published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

A contracted thermosphere, in turn, reduces atmospheric “drag” on satellites - a similar force to that experienced when holding one's hand out the window of a moving car.

This “drag” is what causes satellite orbits to change, drawing them closer to Earth, which means that orbiters like the ISS have to boost themselves back on course with on-board engines.

“The observed CO2 increase is expected to gradually result in a cooler, more contracted upper atmosphere and a consequent reduction in the atmospheric drag experienced by satellites,” said a statement from the Naval Research Laboratory, which took part in the study.

Commenting on the paper, space expert Hugh Lewis said a cooler troposphere will extend the lifetime of space junk - staying farther out for longer instead of burning up in the lower layers of the atmosphere, closer to Earth.

“Consequently, space junk will accumulate at a faster rate and we will see more collisions between space objects as a result,” he told AFP.

“We will also see many more 'near-misses' and these have an important effect on spacecraft operators.”

Lewis said there would be no increased risk for us on Earth as the rate at which satellites re-enter would be reduced.

“However, we would see some effects on services provided from space if an important satellite was destroyed by a collision...,” he said.

On the positive side, satellites would no longer need to boost themselves back into orbit quite as often, meaning they can carry less fuel. - Sapa-AFP

Hungry for more scitech news? Sign up for our daily newsletter


sign up
 
 

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

     

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks