Alexander: SA rugby can transform to host World Cup

Newly elected Saru president Mark Alexander said transformation was "not a tick-box exercise" for SA Rugby. Photo by: Luigi Bennett

Newly elected Saru president Mark Alexander said transformation was "not a tick-box exercise" for SA Rugby. Photo by: Luigi Bennett

Published Oct 27, 2016

Share

Alexander: SA rugby can transform to host World Cup

Transformation is “not a tick-box exercise” for SA Rugby, and ensuring that the policy is implemented could secure hosting rights for the 2023 World Cup that may create over 38 000 permanent or temporary jobs.

That was the word from newly elected SA Rugby president Mark Alexander on Thursday after he was voted in unopposed at a special general council meeting in Johannesburg until the next elections in 2018.

Francois Davids was also elected as the new deputy president to step into Alexander’s previous position, where he defeated WP Rugby Union boss Thelo Wakefield, while Valke Rugby Union president Vivian Lottering winning Davids’ SA Rugby Exco seat.

Transformation has been viewed almost as a “necessary evil” in some quarters of the South African rugby landscape since unity in 1992. There has seldom been a willingness to fully embrace the concept of providing equal opportunities for people of colour on the field and in the boardrooms, and the lack of representation in rugby resulted in Minister of Sport and Recreation Fikile Mbalula withdrawing hosting rights for major international events.

SA Rugby have been named as a candidate to host the 2023 Rugby World Cup, but the organisation will have to make serious progress in the coming months to sway the Eminent Persons Group to agree to recommend that the hosting rights be reinstated so that an official final big for the tournament can be submitted.

“Transformation for us is not a ‘tick-box’ exercise; it is a business imperative for rugby to stay vibrant and relevant as a sport in an evolving South Africa,” Alexander said in a statement on Thursday.

“I’m pleased to say that we have made good progress in 2016, although we know more work needs to be done. That said, I am confident of a favourable report from the Eminent Persons Group to allow us to bid for an event that could have a tremendous, transformative impact on the lives of all South Africans.

“Our economic impact study of what a Rugby World Cup would mean to South Africa underlines the national importance of rugby delivering such a tournament to the country.

“We forecast that it would create 38 600 temporary or permanent jobs; have a direct, indirect and induced economic impact of R27.3 billion; contribute R5.7 billion to low income households; bring almost 200 000 foreign tourists to South Africa and produce R1.4 billion in estimated tax revenues for government.

“Rugby has its challenges, but there are great opportunities for the sport and for what it can do for South Africa.”

But to reach that point, Alexander and his executive will have to attract new sponsors to the game – an issue that was highlighted at last week’s indaba in Cape Town – and one possibility will be to change the structure of SA Rugby’s organisation.

The Springbok team itself has had a sponsor this year who has signed on a tournament-by-tournament basis, having first featured during the Ireland series in June. The company extended the deal in August for the Rugby Championship and the November tour to Europe, but SA Rugby would prefer to have a long-term sponsor in place for a number of years.

And the Super Rugby teams and provincial unions need to be a part of that picture, which is why SA Rugby intend to separate the two, which the organisation said has resulted in proposed amendments to the constitution that are set to be tabled at the General Council meeting in December. It could see the six SA Super Rugby teams partly owned by private companies.

“We are proposing to overhaul our committee structure with the establishment of two new committees – one to focus on licensed, franchise rugby (the six Super Rugby teams), with greater equity representation, and the second to concentrate on non-franchise rugby to look after the interests of the 14 member unions,” Alexander said.

“Financial sustainability is a major focus for our membership and SA Rugby right now.”

After the Vodacom Cup was scrapped this year, there could be further changes to the domestic competitions. The historic Currie Cup failed to attract a title sponsor this season, with only two associate sponsors coming on board. Crowd numbers have also dropped significantly around the country, and the lower income levels have resulted in South African teams battling to hold on to their best players as the financial rewards in Europe and Japan are vast.

In that regard, Alexander said it was being considered to create an “independent group of high-profile individuals from South African civic society” to provide expert advice and be a sounding board.

[email protected]

@ashfakmohamed

Independent Media

Related Topics: