CBS wins Janet malfunction ruling

Comment on this story
iol tonight pic janet cbs nip slip REUTERS Singer Janet Jackson performs with singer Justin Timberlake during the halftime show at Super Bowl XXXVIII in this February 1, 2004 file photo. A U.S. appeals court on November 2, 2011 threw out a federal agency's decision to fine CBS Corp television stations $550,000 for airing singer Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during the 2004 Super Bowl broadcast. REUTERS/Win McNamee/Files

A U.S. appeals court threw out Wednesday a federal agency's decision to fine CBS Corp television stations $550,000 for airing singer Janet Jackson's ''wardrobe malfunction'' during the 2004 Super Bowl broadcast.

A divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said that in imposing the fine, the Federal Communications Commission “arbitrarily and capriciously'' departed from prior policy that exempted “fleeting'' indecency from sanctions.

In a statement, the FCC said it is disappointed by the decision, but plans to use “all the authority at its disposal'' to ensure that broadcasters serve the public interest when they use the public airwaves.

CBS spokeswoman Shannon Jacobs said the New York-based company is gratified by the decision, and hopes the FCC will ''return to the policy of restrained indecency enforcement it followed for decades.''

Jackson's right breast was briefly exposed to almost 90 million TV viewers after the singer Justin Timberlake accidentally ripped off part of her bustier during a halftime show performance. CBS was fined $27,500 for each of the 20 stations it owned.

The 3rd Circuit in 2008 voided the fine, but that decision was vacated when the U.S. Supreme Court in 2009 upheld the FCC policy as rational, in an opinion involving News Corp's Fox TV stations. It did not decide whether the policy was constitutional, and returned the CBS case to the 3rd Circuit.

iol tonight pic CBS Janet Jackson Singers Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson are seen during their performance prior to a wardrobe malfunction during the half time performance at Super Bowl XXXVIII in Houston. A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2011 that CBS should not be fined $550,000 for Janet Jackson's infamous "wardrobe malfunction." (AP Photo/David Phillip, file) AP

Writing for a 2-1 majority, 3rd Circuit Judge Marjorie Rendell said that the FCC had for three decades maintained a ''consistent refusal'' to treat fleeting nude images as indecent, and that there was no justification to change policy for CBS.

She said FCC regulations governing indecency treat images and words interchangeably, and “it follows that the Commission's exception for fleeting material under that regulatory scheme likewise treated images and words alike.''

Judge Anthony Scirica dissented, saying the Fox opinion ''undermines'' the 2008 decision in the CBS case, which he had written. He said the CBS case should be sent to the FCC so it could apply the proper standards.

The Supreme Court is expected in its current term to decide whether the FCC policy is constitutional.

It is reviewing a decision by a federal appeals court in New York that voided the policy as unconstitutionally vague.

That court said it was improper to fine broadcasters over expletives by the singers Bono and Cher on awards shows, or showing a woman's buttocks on “NYPD Blue.'' - Reuters

To vote on our Tonight poll click here

To sign up for our Tonight newsletter click here

sign up

Comment Guidelines

  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

  5. Verified email addresses: All users on Independent Media news sites are now required to have a verified email address before being allowed to comment on articles. You are only required to verify your email address once to have full access to commenting on articles. For more information please read our comment guidelines