Itchy feet?

Subscribe now to our new Travel newsletter!

Airlines getting steamed up over tax, visas

Comment on this story


iol travel feb 13 aubrey cw swiss alps

AP

VISTA VISAS: The old town of Chur, Switzerland, is in the heart of the Swiss Alps and is less than two hours from Zurich airport. It has been suggested that EU countries make visa applications easier to attract tourists from the southern hemisphere and boost business for airlines having to pay exorbitant carbon taxes.

SAA, like most other airlines outside Europe, protested against being compelled to pay into the new EU carbon emissions trading scheme from the beginning of this year. However, the company is doing so rather than incur fines or risk being barred from European airports

.

The scheme was imposed despite calls from the International Air Transport Association to avoid regional measures but join in a worldwide effort to find effective ways of reducing pollution by greenhouse gases. Under the scheme airlines are having to pay for emissions by their aircraft during the entire flight to Europe and not only in European air space, with the money going to EU governments.

It penalises SAA and other airlines in the southern hemisphere because of the distance they fly to reach Europe. But, with China expected to replace the US as the world’s largest economy in a few years, the Chinese government’s decision this week to forbid any of its airlines to pay into the scheme may be a deciding factor in putting an end to it.

It was hoped that the introduction of the scheme might cause the UK government to drop or reduce its high airline passenger departure tax, which was also introduced originally as a measure aimed at reducing pollution by discouraging “unnecessary flying”, but which in fact increases revenue from taxes. But the tax has not been withdrawn or reduced despite pressure from airlines and the UK tourism industry.

However, Tom Jenkins, executive director of the European Tour Operators Association (ETOA), believes there is a better chance of persuading the UK government to reduce the high cost of entry visas and make them less troublesome to obtain.

He told the authoritative London-based An Executive Review of Business Travel that, according to his association members, the UK is the worst country in Europe for handling visa applications. Applicants have to submit “a ream of personal documentation on different areas of their lives”, travel to a visa centre to be questioned on why they want to visit the UK and pay £76 (about R1 000) each “with a one in 10 chance of having the application rejected”.

The reason he believes this process might be made easier is that, despite the high cost of the visas, in some cases the government is losing money in issuing them. He suggests that this “incompetence”, and the fact that more than 20 percent of would-be tourists become discouraged and give up the idea of visiting Europe, compared with the departure tax which brings in money for the government, might enable the tourism industry to “win the argument on visas”.

Daylight flights

South Africans have, for years, been resistant to flying to or from Europe by daylight, with most of us preferring to spend a night flying in order to have an extra day overseas. And if we are flying business class, with lie-flat beds and snacks available all night, a night flight can be positively pleasant.

This is no problem for foreign airlines as far as flights to Europe or the UK are concerned because the aircraft can be used on short haul regional flights after carrying passengers from here, and still be ready to take off for SA again in the evening.

But they lose money on keeping an aircraft parked at an SA airport all day after arriving here. Edelweiss Air, which is providing a service between Zurich and Cape Town this summer, began daylight flights to SA on Mondays and Fridays, returning the same night.

But, from last week, the daylight flight to SA on Mondays has been changed to a night flight, although they still have a daylight flight on Fridays. Karin Duncker, spokeswoman for Edelweiss, explained the decision had been taken because some passengers preferred daylight flights and some night flights. It had been found that the majority preferred a night flight on Mondays, giving them an extra day in Zurich.

However, some South Africans have found that a daylight flight arriving in early evening rather than in the morning rush hour has a lot to recommend it.

The two British Airways flights from Cape Town to London every day in the summer months leave here at 8am and arrive at Heathrow at 5.45pm although the return flights to SA are overnight. - Weekend Argus

Get our new, free Travel newsletter - subscribe here...

sign up

Share |  

Facebook icon

Facebook

Twitter icon

Twitter

Google icon

Google

Yahoo icon

Yahoo

Reddit icon

Reddit

del.icio.us icon

del.icio.us

Pinterest icon

Pinterest

Email

Print

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (0 votes) 0 Stars

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)

mark, wrote

IOL Comments
07:08pm on 17 February 2012
IOL Comments

The solutrion is simple, just charge the European airlines 5 times the amount that they charge our airlines for the same route and call it a reciprical tax. See how quickly they don't sign up to it. All these so called green taxes is just another way for these overspending governments to steel more taxes that they otherwise could not raise.Where has all the green tax money gone too? What is thew reduction in "green house gasses" ? Nothing absolutely nothing.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
12:50pm on 14 February 2012
IOL Comments

"The two British Airways flights from Cape Town to London every day in the summer months leave here at 8am and arrive at Heathrow at 5.45pm although the return flights to SA are overnight." Well, that's just "plane" wrong. It states there are TWO morning flights every day from CT (there is one) and implies there are no night flights from CT. And, as far as "aircraft can be used on short haul regional flights after carrying passengers from here" I don't see toomany wide-body long-haul planes (747 for ex) being used later in the day for "regional" flights. All that is required is for an airline to have two planes on a service. One leaves each end in the morning, the other at night. Next day, they swap. The problem is, some of these small airlines don't have two planes to use, or the business for four flights a day.

Report this

IOL Comments

ian, wrote

IOL Comments
11:59am on 14 February 2012
IOL Comments

@ champagne -That is just what they want! It is the passenger who ends up the loser paying taxes coming and going. We need a solution that bites them in the backside and allows all right thinking people to walk away laughing. The beauty of my solution is that the more they stick to their tax, or even increase it, the more they hurt their own airline industry. (But it is all academic. SA has not got the guts to stand up to them. It will have to be the Americans and the Chinese).

Report this

IOL Comments

champagne, wrote

IOL Comments
11:31am on 14 February 2012
IOL Comments

OK so what is stopping SA charging the EU airlines the same tax???

Report this

IOL Comments

ian, wrote

IOL Comments
08:01am on 14 February 2012
IOL Comments

I think I have come up with a solution to this particular tax problem, but it is only for great countries such as the USA who do not pander to the Man-made Global Warming hoax or what it morphed into, the ever-present, Climate Change. Certainly, it is not for wimps like South Africa. Now it goes like this: Pass legislation in your own country imposing a tax on all airlines that is exactly double the tax rate imposed by the Eurotrash on airlines due to ‘Climate Change’. Then pass half the money collected back to the airlines based in your country with the proviso that it is specifically only to be used to give their passengers a tax rebate equal to the tax paid due to European regulations. This effectively makes the tax revenue-neutral to airlines in your country, but puts European airlines at a massive disadvantage. Warning however: make your tax a ratio of the European tax, not a set amount. The European tax will soon start going up because the present low rate is just the thin edge of the wedge to try to gain public acceptance of this lefty-liberal kook idea.

Report this

IOL Comments

Ringmaster, wrote

IOL Comments
11:20pm on 13 February 2012
IOL Comments

Global Warming - the best scam of the century!

Report this

IOL Comments

ADW, wrote

IOL Comments
10:17pm on 13 February 2012
IOL Comments

Read difference between Science and Religion. I'd rather live in a world erring on the side of sustainability than erring on the side of eventual extinction. However, I do think for the tax to be fare in where it is imposed, airlines should only have to pay for European airspace sectors, not the entire journey.

Report this

IOL Comments

fartarse, wrote

IOL Comments
09:40pm on 13 February 2012
IOL Comments

Next thing they will charge people for farting!!! They must be desperate for money. What gaurantee is there that they will use that money for cleaning the air that was polluted in African airspace? Sounds like an European version of the etolling scam to me!

Report this

IOL Comments

james, wrote

IOL Comments
06:20pm on 13 February 2012
IOL Comments

Global Warming - the only religion that collects tithing from believers and non-believers alike! This is also discrimination because people from the Southern hemisphere have to pay more in this religeous tax than those already in Europe!

Report this

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 9 of 9

Business Directory