Farlam report blames Marikana victims

In this file photo taken on May 14, 2013, members of the mining community look on as they are addressed by leaders during a strike at Lonmin's Marikana platinum mine near Rustenburg in the North West. The author says he never expected the report to favour the victims of the massacre. Photo: Reuters

In this file photo taken on May 14, 2013, members of the mining community look on as they are addressed by leaders during a strike at Lonmin's Marikana platinum mine near Rustenburg in the North West. The author says he never expected the report to favour the victims of the massacre. Photo: Reuters

Published Jun 30, 2015

Share

THE RELEASE of the Farlam report and its findings is welcomed with disbelief and confirmation of our suspicions. The commission appointed by President Jacob Zuma had to serve the aspirations and wants of the master. To have expected anything other than what is in the report would be to expect the responsible judge to bite the hand that feeds him.

Limited powers

Having sat in on most of the hearings from Rustenburg to Centurion, I never expected anything that would favour the victims. So I am not surprised that once again the victim has been subjected to blame by the powerful. I think this was the reason for giving the Marikana Commission limited powers, so that the truth does not come out but remains the reserve of the elitist classes who live on the oppression and exploitation of the working classes.

It does not make sense that the findings put much of the blame on the striking miners whose human rights were violated by both the corporation and the government. The workers only wanted the company to discuss their grievances with them, and address their aspirations and restore their dignity. They, like all of us, desired to get out of the shame of mere survival and to live respectfully. The result, of course, is that they remain disgraced and humiliated. So they died in vain despite their votes that put the ruling party into power.

However, there is sufficient evidence that Lonmin is guilty of negligence for failing to attend to the rights of workers – to even listen to their grievances.

In addition, on the one hand there is no doubt that the police collaborated with the government and used live ammunition on the indefensible and peaceful strikers who had assembled on the koppie to engage their employer on their living and working conditions. On the other hand, there is no evidence that on the day of the massacre, the strikers charged at the police.

The decision for the ‘D-day’ had been taken by the police, to ‘kill this thing’ because instruction had been given for ‘concomitant action’ to be taken. At least, this is what I understood from lieutenant-general Zukiswa Mbombo when I visited Marikana a few hours before the massacre.

Why did they not trust Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (Amcu) president Joseph Mathunjwa, who had been entrusted with the promise by management that they would talk? And why was I not listened to when I conveyed the striker’s aspirations and needs? I have no doubt that one more day would have produced better results than the massacre.

Warning

Two days before the incident, Lonmin had been warned by the Bench Marks Foundation that there was possible eruption of violence in the mines because the workers and the locals were unhappy with the situation in Marikana, namely the lack of housing, and unhealthy living and dangerous working conditions.

And now, even with the release of the Farlam report, the social conditions have not been attended to. So, blaming workers’ organisations is not justifiable but a travesty of justice and a vindication of state power and the influence of capital.

The use of violence in any situation cannot be condoned – it is wrong and unacceptable. But there is a need to do some introspection before pointing a finger at others, lest one is blamed for wrong judgement. The outcome of the report shows a lack of integrity in our leadership, which is self-serving. If this was not true, there wouldn’t be as many service delivery protests as there have been.

Uncaring government

The report reflects preference towards an uncaring government that uses the working classes for its own end. The recommendation to further investigate is another whitewash and nothing tangible must be expected of it because there is enough evidence to prosecute those who contributed to the massacre.

It is a fact that Lonmin contributed to the deaths of its employees by forcing them to return to work knowing that the situation was dangerous and could result in injury, if not death. Cyril Ramaphosa encouraged action that would end the strike in favour of capitalism, in order to protect his shares, and the police ordered the use of force, which killed 34 miners. The Justice cluster must have known that the use of lethal force would result in killing people. The president knew that the house was on fire but left for Mozambique instead of intervening.

The president’s failure to apologise means that it’s time for him to go, as well as all those who contributed to the massacre. Focusing on Riah Phiyega and Mbombo is not an answer but a cover-up for the executive. It is a well-known fact that both are unfit for the office they hold. So, the government owes the workers and their families an unconditional apology and compensation for the loss of their breadwinners. The government must, as a matter of principle, withdraw Lonmin’s mining licence.

Both the government and Lonmin must as a matter of restitution build a memorial monument in commemoration of the fallen workers and August 16th should be declared a public holiday. If this is not done, the report will remain salt to the wounds of our people, and history is very likely to repeat itself.

Dr Jo Seoka is the chairman of the Bench Marks Foundation.

Related Topics: