Apartheid-era crimes still haunt us

File picture: A Men's Month is an insult to the genesis of Women's Month, which honours the courageous actions of women on August 9, 1956, says the writer.

File picture: A Men's Month is an insult to the genesis of Women's Month, which honours the courageous actions of women on August 9, 1956, says the writer.

Published Aug 13, 2015

Share

An accountability vacuum remains for the families of many of those murdered under the regime, writes Angela Mudukuti.

August 9 marked national Women’s Day – the day that 20 000 women marched to the Union Buildings in 1956 to protest against pass laws under the apartheid government. What better opportunity to commemorate other women who were part of the struggle, such as Nokuthula Simelane.

Simelane was a 23-year-old university graduate with a promising future.

But she put her country’s freedom before her own ambition and acted as a courier for Umkhonto we Sizwe, the armed wing of the ANC, moving between Swaziland and South Africa.

She was abducted, tortured and forcibly made to disappear by members of the security branch of the former South African Police in 1983.

Simelane was captured after being betrayed by a fellow comrade, who she was meant to meet at the Carlton Centre in Joburg on the morning of September 8, 1983.

Instead of meeting her comrade, she arrived to find members of South Africa’s security police waiting for her. She was abducted that day and never seen again.

The security police drove her to the police barracks in Joburg where she was kept in a small secluded room, tortured and abused.

Several days later she was moved to an isolated farm where the torture continued. Simelane was shackled, beaten beyond recognition, kept in unsanitary conditions and in solitary confinement.

The security police tortured her for more than three weeks in a bid to break her spirit and turn her into an informant.

Her family have been unrelenting in their quest for answers and in 1996, a police docket was opened.

Five years later, in 2001, the amnesty committee of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) heard testimony from certain security branch police who were granted amnesty for her abduction and torture, despite the fact that the amnesty committee found they had been dishonest about the brutal torture endured by Simelane.

In addition to blatantly misleading the commission, no one applied for amnesty for her murder.

In pursuit of truth and accountability for the murder and torture of Simelane, her family delved into a long process of correspondence and engagement with the post-apartheid National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and the SAPS, including requesting a judicial inquest into her death.

Despite repeated requests, correspondence and meetings with the authorities, little progress was made and no decision to either prosecute suspected perpetrators who did not apply for amnesty, or hold an inquest, was made by the NPA.

Having exhausted all options, on May 20 this year, Thembi Nkadimeng, Simelane’s sister, filed an application before the Gauteng Division of the High Court seeking to compel the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) to make a decision in respect of the disappearance of her sister.

The application also cites the national police commissioner, the minister of police, the minister of justice and correctional services, and the suspected perpetrators – Willem Helm Coetzee, Anton Pretorius, Frederick Barnard Mong, Timothy Radebe and Willem Schoon.

Coetzee, Pretorius and Barnard Mong have indicated through their attorney that they will not oppose the court application, while Radebe and Schoon are yet to file any papers before the court.

Radebe and Schoon are also the only two suspected perpetrators who never applied for amnesty before the TRC.

Apartheid-era crimes and the lack of accountability continue to be issues the country faces today.

This case highlights the fact that though the TRC process was crucial for a peaceful transition from apartheid to democracy and equality, it was by no means perfect.

Amnesty was granted even to those who did not fully disclose the truth, in direct contravention of the TRC’s own laws.

This has left an accountability vacuum and many unanswered questions for the families of those who were murdered under the brutal apartheid regime.

The lack of prosecutions thereafter, despite the TRC handing over a number of dockets to the NPA for further action, has added insult to injury.

While the previous NDPPs have not been very helpful with regard to this case, there are indications that the recently appointed National Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Shaun Abrahams, is willing to give this case the appropriate attention it deserves and to find an amicable solution that aligns with the principles enshrined in the constitution of South Africa.

Positive developments in this regard include the fact that the NDPP and the minister of justice have finally agreed to set up an inquest before the high court.

The NDPP has a responsibility in accordance with the terms of his office and with regard to the spirit and purport of this vibrant constitutional democracy to do right by those who sacrificed their lives for the freedom of this nation.

It remains to be seen how matters will unfold, but what is clear is that the Simelane family are in great need of answers and closure.

Having recently celebrated Women’s Day and taken the time to commemorate the great women who have shaped the nation, let the story of Simelane, and others like it, remain in our hearts and minds.

* Mudukuti is the international criminal justice lawyer at the Southern Africa Litigation Centre. She has worked at the International Criminal Court in the Hague.

** The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Independent Media.

The Star

Related Topics: