Cutting congestion lifts growth, but cities face many challenges
INTERNATIONAL – Cities are economic powerhouses that create jobs, opportunities and ideas. They offer businesses and services the chance to interact because people live in close proximity. And they are culturally rich in arts, sports and entertainment.
No wonder 56 percent of the world chooses urban living – almost 80 per cent of people in developed economies.
But cities face many challenges, particularly congestion. Delays mean travel times in the world’s 50 biggest cities are roughly 40 percent longer than they should be, meaning people spend hundreds of hours a year sitting in unnecessary traffic.
We estimate that urban congestion costs around $1.7 trillion a year in the developed world and could be nearly 30 percent higher by 2030 unless the problem is tackled. In emerging countries, rising incomes and increased urbanisation could double the costs of congestion to $2 trillion in the next decade unless cities become more efficient.
Worldwide, the cost could reach 3.5 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP).
Even 30 minutes a day sitting in a car is 7 percent of your working time. It’s unproductive and stressful, and as cities get bigger, the strains on networks will increase.
Traffic increases petrol or diesel consumption, which increases greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming, and exacerbate local air pollutants – nitrogen dioxide, nitric oxide, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter – that harm human health.
Fewer cars, better public transport, more walking, cycling or car-sharing are solutions. Well-designed cities can minimise the distance and number of journeys made. Rethinking the sprawling transport networks that have evolved in cities would help. Autonomous vehicles, new road layouts and changed shopping and delivery habits could cut congestion.
But already the world has an infrastructure deficit estimated at $15 trillion or 0.5 per cent of global GDP – and the cost would be greater still if countries tackle the UN’s sustainable development goals. Transportation infrastructure under-investment alone is put at $300 billion, despite the economic, social and environmental benefits that could be unlocked from improved public transport networks.
Reducing the hours stuck in traffic, rather than increasing them, by 20 percent over 10 years, could add 0.2 percentage points to annual global GDP growth. While fewer vehicles on the road would hit car makers, an infrastructure programme could also boost short-term growth.
We’ve looked at congestion in 1 000 cities worldwide. Most of the cities with the lowest rate of congestion are smaller European centres: most people in Copenhagen and Amsterdam cycle to work, for instance. Shanghai’s impressive public transport means that despite a population of 26 million, it is only as congested as Lisbon, Hamburg or Bordeaux – cities a fraction of the size.
But Dublin, with 1.2 million people, is as congested as Sao Paulo, which has a 21 million population.
The benefits from better-designed cities, improved public transport and fewer cars are huge. Besides health benefits, easier mobility boosts the service sector if bars and restaurants become more accessible. And denser living promotes the sharing economy.
However, politicians and private property developers must promote change. Green bonds can provide funding, but foresight is just as important. These changes require a longer-term approach to city planning with the benefits accruing over many years.
James Pomeroy is a global economist at HSBC.