SA loses about R7 billion lost in excise tax and jobs to impact of illicit tobacco trade
JOHANNESBURG – Finance Minister Tito Mboweni announced in his 2020 Budget that there would be a renewed focus on illicit and criminal activity, including noncompliance by some religious public benefit organisations.
Estimates of the size of the illicit trade in cigarettes, alcohol and illegally imported clothing run into billions of rands of lost government revenue in excise duties and taxes, while hundreds of thousands of local jobs are also lost, according to research by Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA).
The research, presented at a BLSA event in Johannesburg yesterday, showed that the most prevalent type of illicit tobacco were cigarette packs sold below master contract token (MCT) price (R20.01 in 2020). Some packs were sold at R10, the research showed.
The size of the illicit cigarette trade was estimated at 30-35 percent of the total formal market and 42 percent of the informal market.
Cigarettes priced at less that R20 were sold in all provinces ranging from 26.7 percent of the market in Limpopo to 37.3 percent in the Northern Cape Illicit products were sold in three out of four shops in the non-organised retail space.
The economic impact of illicit tobacco products was estimated to be a R7-R8 billion loss in excise tax and job losses. It also contributed to increased spending on health.
By volume, the illicit alcohol market was estimated at 14,5 percent, or by value R12.9 billion, of the total market.
By volume, smuggling contributes 28 percent, tax leakage 24.8 percent, counterfeit 24.3 percent and homebrew products 22.9 percent of the total illicit alcohol market.
By product type, illicit spirits accounted for 45 percent of the total volume of illicit alcohol products market, homebrew 23 percent, sugar fermented 25 percent, ethanol 5 percent, and beer 0.1 percent.
Illicit alcohol products resulted in an estimated economic loss of R6.4 billion in excise tax and job losses, the research showed.
The revenue loss by type was smuggling (38 percent), counterfeit (30.5 percent), tax leakage (31,1 percent), and homebrew products (0.4 percent).
Excessive regulations and restrictions on licit alcoholic beverages, high excise tax, ineffective enforcement and border controls, inadequate sanctions for offenders, and corruption were some of the problems that led to illicit alcohol flooding the local market.
Availability of production inputs, high prices, and restrictions on licit alcohol were some of the enablers of illicit alcohol trade in the business environment,
Ethanol was often smuggled from Mozambique and Eswatini, while the smuggling of premium products from Europe took place through the major ports of Durban,
Cape Town, Walvis Bay, Beira, and Dar es Salaam.
In the clothing and textile trade, the most common form of illicit trade was through the under-declaration of customs value.
A study in 2007 showed a 50 percent undervaluation of items from China.
This illicit trade was enabled often through Inadequately staffed customs ports of entry, inexperienced and corrupt customs officials, as well as lack of regulatory compliance, rebates abuse, tax and vat fraud, and customs fraud.
Cheap (lower quality) imports, illegal imports of second-hand clothing (dumpling) and counterfeit clothes coming from Asia, and rerouting via other countries, had resulted in the closure of many clothing and textile industry factories.