Visiting the white house can boost your stock price

Published May 13, 2017

Share

New York - New research shows that visiting the White House during

the Obama years yielded a payoff in the stock price of the visitor's company.

Will the same be true of the Trump years?

We may never know, because President Donald Trump has ended

Barack Obama's practice of making the visitor log public.The study, released

late last month on the website of the National Bureau of Economic

Research, found that the shares of companies whose top executives

visited White House officials performed about 0.9 percentage point better than

the overall stock market after the visits. 

The authors, Jeffrey Brown and Jiekun Huang, finance

professors in the College of Business at the University of Illinois

at Urbana-Champaign, say the stock-market lift occurred from 10

trading days before the meetings to 40 trading days after them.  They

reviewed 2,286 meetings between corporate executives and federal government

officials at the White House from 2009 through 2015, excluding meetings with 50

or more attendees, in which face time would presumably be limited.

"The evidence in our paper suggests that access to

high-level officials in the executive branch can be an important source of

competitive advantage for firms," they write. The paper, "the

entire President's Friends: Political Access and Firm Value," can

be downloaded from the NBER site for $5.

Read also:  JSE cancels Oakbay trades, starts probe

As a test of their results, Brown and Huang looked at how the

companies that benefited from access to the Obama White House did after Trump's

surprise election. In the three days after the voting, the companies

underperformed the overall market by about 0.8 percentage points, they found.

That was all the time it took to see the difference the new president made.

A thorough study of Trump administration visits and

corresponding stock performance would be impossible, because the president on

April 14 closed the visitor logs to public inspection. At the time, White

House Communications Director Mike Dubke cited “grave national security risks

and privacy concerns.”

"We agree there are major risks associated with the

documents’ release," Brown and Huang wrote in an article about their

research that was published online by Politico Magazine on May 8 "Political

ones." 

Among corporate chieftains in Brown and Huang's study, the

three most frequent White House visitors during the period were David

Cote, then CEO of Honeywell International, with 30 visits; Jeffrey Immelt, CEO

of General Electric, with 22 visits; and Roger Altman, executive chairman

of Evercore Partners, with 21 visits.

All three had things to discuss aside from their own

businesses. Cote, who is now Honeywell's

executive chairman, was appointed by Obama in 2010 to serve on a blue-ribbon

deficit reduction commission. Immelt, was chair of Obama's Council on Jobs and

Competitiveness. And Altman was interviewed by Obama as a possible director of

the National Economic Council.

Regardless of why they were there, it clearly doesn't hurt

to get face time with the president or his top aides which is why

good-government types say it's important to know who gets into the White House.

"Trump is avoiding criticism about who visits him, and

he’s avoiding scrutiny by voiding the voluntary disclosure policy," said

John Wonderlich, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, which favours

public disclosure of government affairs.

"This study tells us that the Obama

administration did have deep ties with CEOs of top American

companies," Wonderlich said. "The Trump administration is also

going to have deep ties." According to the finance professors'

research, the three people in the White House who were most visited were

Valerie Jarrett, senior adviser to President Obama, with 107 visits; Jeffrey

Zients, director of the Office of Management and Budget and later director of

the National Economic Council, with 103 visits; and Obama himself, with

100 visits.

Kevin Lewis, a spokesman for the former president, said

Obama had no immediate comment on the research. GE pointed out Immelt's

White House appointment. Honeywell didn't have an immediate comment.

Evercore, declined to comment. Brown, the co-author, is

familiar with the White House, having served as a senior economist on President

George W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers in 2001 and 2002. He served on

Bush's Social Security Advisory Board from 2006 to 2008.

The Obama administration voluntarily released logs of all

White House visits except for personal family visits and sensitive personnel

matters such as visits of potential Supreme Court nominees. Previous presidents

had more restrictive disclosure policies.

BLOOMBERG

 

Related Topics: