Johnny Depp files appeal in Amber Heard defamation case

Johnny Depp. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

Johnny Depp. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

Published Nov 4, 2022

Share

Johnny Depp has appealed the "erroneous" decision that awarded Amber Heard $2 million in damages in their defamation trial.

The former couple were embroiled in a six-week trial earlier this year over an op-ed the “Aquaman” star wrote in 2018 about being a victim of domestic violence, with the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star ultimately winning over $10 million in damages after winning all three of his defamation claims and his ex-wife winning one of her three counter-suit claims.

But on Wednesday, Depp's legal team made a filing in the Virginia Court of Appeals, arguing the 59-year-old star should not be held liable for comments made by his attorney, Adam Waldman, who had told the Daily Mail in comments published on April 26, 2020, that Heard and her friends had set-up his client by calling police with a "hoax" of abuse claims in 2016, remarks the jury decided he had made while acting as an agent for the “Black Mass” actor.

Watch video:

Depp's lawyers argued in court documents that, despite an "emphatic favourable verdict" for their client, "the trial court was confronted with a number of novel and complex legal and factual issues, and although the trial court decided the vast majority of those issues sensibly and correctly, a few rulings were erroneous."

They continued: "The judgment in Ms Heard’s favour on that lone statement is erroneous. Ms Heard’s claim was fatally flawed, and the trial court should have granted Mr Depp’s motion for summary judgment and his motion to strike the evidence.

"Ms Heard presented no evidence at trial that Mr Depp was personally involved in directing or making any of the three Waldman statements.

“Indeed, Mr Depp testified that he had never even seen the Waldman statements prior to the filing of the Counter-claim in August of 2020.

"Mr. Waldman is an independent contractor, whose allegedly tortuous conduct is not automatically attributable to Mr Depp" and "no evidence of Mr Waldman's actual malice was presented at trial" by Heard's legal team.

"This Court should reverse the judgment on Ms Heard's counter-claim as to the April 27 Waldman statement, but should otherwise affirm the judgment in Mr Depp's favour."

Heard has also lodged an appeal over the verdict, having previously failed in a bid to have a mistrial declared amid claims of jury fraud.