Midsized SUVs fail US crash test

The latest Jeep Cherokee received an overall safety rating of 'marginal' while its Wrangler sibling was deemed 'good'. Photo: IIHS.

The latest Jeep Cherokee received an overall safety rating of 'marginal' while its Wrangler sibling was deemed 'good'. Photo: IIHS.

Published May 12, 2015

Share

Arlington, Virginia - Most of the midsized SUVs that were crash tested by a prominent US safety group fared poorly, with the worst performer being the Dodge Journey, which sustained severe structural damages.

Of the seven models tested, Nissan's new Murano and Jeep's four-door Wrangler were the only vehicles to earn a 'good' rating, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).

The SUVs underwent the small overlap front crash test, which is tougher than the head-on crash tests used by the US government, according to automakers and IIHS.

Small overlap crashes, involving only the small front corner of a vehicle, affect the less protected outer edges of the car. In such crashes, the front wheel, suspension system and firewall bear the brunt, which can lead to serious leg and foot injuries. Ford's Flex was rated ‘acceptable’, while the rest received ‘marginal’ or ‘poor’ ratings, according to the IIHS.

The Hyundai Santa Fe, Jeep Cherokee and Dodge Durango were rated ‘marginal’.

In January, compact cars including the Fiat 500 and Honda Fit (Jazz) performed the worst of any vehicle segment in the test. -Reuters

IIHS OVERALL RATINGS

Dodge Journey - Poor

Dodge Durango - Marginal

Ford Flex - Acceptable

Jeep Cherokee - Marginal

Jeep Wrangler - Good

Hyundai Santa Fe - Marginal

Nissan Murano - Good

Related Topics: