Kenyan president attacks judiciary after court overturns election

Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said the country has "a problem" with its judiciary that must be fixed. Picture: AP Photo Eric Murinzi

Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta said the country has "a problem" with its judiciary that must be fixed. Picture: AP Photo Eric Murinzi

Published Sep 2, 2017

Share

Nairobi - Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta

said on Saturday the country has "a problem" with its judiciary

that must be fixed.

He was speaking a day after the Supreme Court annulled his

election win last month and ordered a new poll within 60 days.

"We shall revisit this thing. We clearly have a problem," he

said, referring to the judiciary.

"Who even elected you? Were you? We have a problem and we

must fix it," he said, speaking on live television at the State

House in Nairobi after he met with governors and other elected

officials from his Jubilee party.

Kenyatta, however, also repeated his message from Friday

that he would respect the court's ruling.

The decision to annul the election was an unprecedented

move in Africa where governments often hold sway over judges --

and the first time on the continent that a court ruled against

the electoral victory of an incumbent.

The president's latest comments mark the second time since

Friday's ruling that he has spoken critically about the

judiciary in public. On Friday during an impromptu rally in

Nairobi, he accused the court of ignoring the will of the people

and dismissed the chief justice's colleagues as "wakora", or

crooks.

The president's public appearances since the ruling suggest

he intends to campaign rigorously ahead of the re-run of the

Aug.8 poll.

He said via Twitter on Saturday: "For now let us meet at the

ballot."

Attention now turns back to the election board. The court

ruled that it had "failed, neglected or refused to conduct the

presidential election in a manner consistent with the dictates

of the constitution".

Raila Odinga, the veteran opposition leader whose coalition

brought the petition against the election board to the Supreme

Court, said on Friday that some officials from the commission

should face criminal prosecution.

The chairman of the election board said there would be

personnel changes, but it was not clear if that would be enough

for the opposition. Sweeping out the whole board would

complicate efforts to hold a new poll within two months.

Last month's election -- which included the presidential

poll in addition to races at other levels of government -- was

one of the most expensive ever held in Africa. Ahead of the vote

Kenya's treasury said preparation and execution of polling would

cost the equivalent of around $480 million.

Analysts saw the president's latest comments on the

judiciary as a worrisome development.

"It's extremely unfortunate that Kenyatta seems to be

issuing veiled threats at the judiciary," said Murithi Mutiga, a

Nairobi-based senior Africa analyst at the International Crisis

Group.

"This was a tremendous moment for Kenyan democracy, where

the court upheld the rule of law. Politicians should be careful

not to incite the public against the judiciary."

On Friday, Chief Justice David Maraga said the Supreme

Court's verdict was backed by four of the six judges and

declared Kenyatta's victory "invalid, null and void".

Details of the ruling will be released within 21 days.

Prior to last month's election Maraga spoke out to emphasise

the judiciary’s independence.

In a statement he read out on behalf of the Judicial Service

Commission less than a week before the election, he listed

instances in which politicians -- from the ruling party and the

opposition -- had tried to intervene with the judiciary’s work.

“The emerging culture of public lynching of judges and

judicial officers by the political class is a vile affront to

the rule of law and must be fiercely resisted,” the statement

read. “We wish to state that ... the judiciary will not cower to

these intimidating tactics.”

Kenya's judiciary went through sweeping changes in a bid to

restore confidence in the legal system after the bloodshed

following the 2007 election. 

Reuters

Related Topics: