#StateCaptureInquiry: 'Crucial' Jonas testimony to be heard today

Former Deputy Finance Minister Mcebisi Jonas. Picture: Henk Kruger/African News Agency (ANA) Archives

Former Deputy Finance Minister Mcebisi Jonas. Picture: Henk Kruger/African News Agency (ANA) Archives

Published Aug 24, 2018

Share

Johannesburg - Former deputy finance minister Mcebisi Jonas is set to testify at the judicial commission of inquiry into state capture this morning.

Jonas' testimony could be crucial for the inquiry as he had publicly announced that he was allegedly bribed by one of the Gupta brothers. The commission of inquiry into state capture, which is headed by deputy chief justice Raymond Zondo, is investigating allegations of corruption largely centred around the infamous Gupta family and former president Jacob Zuma.  

It has been alleged that the Gupta family used its relationship with Zuma to score business deals with state-owned enterprises. Billions were allegedly paid out to the family in suspicious business deals involving government officials.

The first day of the inquiry was spent on outlining the terms of reference which will be guided by the State of Capture report released in 2016 by former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela.

Jonas had confirmed news reports in 2016 that he had been offered the position of finance minister, replacing Nhlanhlana Nene. He said he was offered the position by Ajay Gupta in the presence of Duduzane Zuma and businessman Fana Hlongwane. He added that he was offered a bribe of R600 000 in cash and would later be paid R600 million for taking up the position. He refused the bribe. 

Ajay Gupta, Duduzane, and Hlongwane have denied Jonas' version of events. Jonas' testimony is expected to focus on what he told the Public Protector and the statement he submitted. He is the second witness to take the stand. 

On Tuesday, Treasury official Willie Mathebula took the stand and outlined the Treasury's procurement processes. Mathebula's testimony also focused on the abuse of procurement processes. Mathebula said there were instances where some government entities used the deviation clause to circumvent procurement processes which would essentially allow them to award tenders to whomever they chose.

IOL

Related Topics: