South Africa ranks second in the world for reliable Covid-19 news

The spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Cape Town

The spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Cape Town

Published Apr 17, 2020

Share

Cape Town – The spread of fake news is a crisis in itself and false Covid-19 posts on social media have caused mass panic both locally and internationally.

There has been a flood of fake news posts shared on various platforms, from WhatsApp to Facebook and Twitter, but South African lockdown regulations have made it more difficult by criminalising the disemmination of misinformation and fake or misleading news reports. Anyone caught spreading fake news is could be fined or imprisoned for up to six months.

According to  Covid19 Infodemics Observatory, South Africa ranks second after Singapore for the most reliable Covid-19 related news and information.

The Infodemic risk analysis has been collected from over 100 million public messages, taking into account news reliability from URL’s pointing to reliable news sources, unverified social bots and the average amount of unverified posts per day in a country.

Heres how it works :

The classification of reliable vs potentially unreliable news sources is based on joining the work of different classifiers:

- M. Zimdar for the Washington Post (2016)

- C. Silverman for BuzzFeed News (2017)

- Starbird et al, ICWSM (2018)

- Fletcher et al, Factsheets, Reuters Institute and University of Oxford (2018)

- Grinberg et al, Science 363, 374 (2019)

- MediaBiasFactCheck (2020)

A few sources have been manually classified and annotated.

When two classifiers do not agree on the classification of the same source,  they pick the potentially more harmful classification, in terms of lower priority:

.tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;}

.tg td{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;border-color:black;}

.tg th{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;border-color:black;}

.tg .tg-1wig{font-weight:bold;text-align:left;vertical-align:top}

.tg .tg-0lax{text-align:left;vertical-align:top}

Priority

Category

Type

1

SCIENCE

Reliable

2

MAINSTREAM MEDIA

Reliable

3

SATIRE

Unreliable

4

CLICKBAIT

Unreliable

5

OTHER

Unknown

6

SHADOW

Unknown

7

POLITICAL

Unreliable

8

FAKE/HOAX

Unreliable

9

CONSPIRACY/JUNKSCI

Unreliable

For instance, if news from xyz.com is classified by two distinct data sources as POLITICAL and MSM, an algorithm will assign the label ‘POLITICAL’. Note that this does not means that it is fake: it is just potentially unreliable according to one or more expert classifiers.

OTHER here refers to URLs pointing to content not verifiable automatically (eg. videos), while SHADOW refers to shortened URLs poitning to dead links. In both cases, it is not possible to assess their reliability/unreliability and they are classified as UNKNOWN, and consequently excluded from the analysis. 

Coronavirus Monitor

Related Topics: