Raphael Martin Picture: Supplied
Raphael Martin Picture: Supplied

City of Cape Town manager accused of child rape served with disciplinary in prison

By Monique Duval/Daily Voice Time of article published Jul 1, 2020

Share this article:

Cape Town - A City of Cape Town subcouncil manager accused of raping a 13-year-old Strandfontein girl could be fired by the municipality after officials served his disciplinary notice on him in Pollsmoor Prison last week.

The rape case of Subcouncil 23 manager, Raphael Martin, 53, returned to the Mitchells Plain Magistrates’ Court amid community protests yesterday morning. 

Tempers flared lastweek when the distraught family of the traumatised teen revealed that she had allegedly been raped by the former Umkhonto we Sizwe freedom fighter for three years and hid it from her family out of fear.

He was arrested after a medical examination confirmed the girl had also been sodomised during this time. Martin appeared via the Audio Video Remand (AVR) system from Pollsmoor Prison where his case was postponed to 30 July for a formal bail hearing. City spokesperson, Priya Reddy, said they have commenced suspension proceedings and are in the process of making a final decision.

She said the City was informed of the bail hearing date and said as Martin is not reporting for work, he is not being paid. Reddy explains that if he is released on bail, he will be suspended with full benefits, but if his bail conditions prevent him from going to work, he will get no salary. “The charges are of sufficiently serious nature to seek dismissal,” said Reddy.

“The accused’s disciplinary hearing is scheduled for 8 July. “The notice was served on the accused, and signed by himself, in Pollsmoor Prison on 26 June. 

“The employee will be required to answer to a number of allegations during this hearing, among which the criminal charges against him; gross misconduct; conduct unbecoming of his position; conduct that has or is likely to have damaged irreparably the trust between himself, the City as his employer, and the communities he serves; and conduct which has or is likely to bring the name of the City in disrepute.

“Should it transpire during and subsequent to the disciplinary hearing that the above mentioned are true, the City shall argue for the summary dismissal upon conclusion of the hearing.” Reddy said the hearing will continue in Martin’s absence, and he is entitled to have representation present at this hearing.

Daily Voice

Share this article: