Two books, "The Solution Revolution" and "22 Ideas to Fix the World," say regular people can save the world. One is optimistic, the other is bleak. Illustrates BOOKS-SOLUTIONS (category e), by Carlos Lozada (c) 2013, The Washington Post. Moved Sunday, Dec. 29, 2013. (handouts) (Newscom TagID: latwpphotos105942.jpg) [Photo via Newscom]

Add another resolution for 2014: hit the gym, work on that novel – and save the world, says Carlos Lozada

Washington - The cover of Wired magazine’s December issue inspires me. But it also stresses me out.

“Guest Editor Bill Gates Wants You to Fix the World,” it proclaims. Then, three ambitions: “Big Ideas. Smart Innovation. Bright Future.” Next, three commands: “End Poverty. Save Lives. Cure Disease.”

I read magazines and books to learn how other people are making the world a better place. Now it’s up to me?

I appreciate the vote of confidence, but that’s a lot of pressure. Especially because it’s no longer just about volunteering on weekends or giving to charity. You can’t end poverty and cure disease in your spare time. No, unless you’re constantly innovating, disrupting, problem-solving, life-hacking, starting up and spinning off, you’re missing out on The Solution Revolution.

That’s the title – and the ethos – of a new book by management consultants William Eggers and Paul Macmillan, who take Wired’s ambitions and up the ante. They describe an alternative economy, one devoted less to making good money than to doing good with money, one in which “businesses, social entrepreneurs, non-profits and multinational companies compete, coordinate and collaborate to solve megaproblems”, whether they be poverty or poor housing, human trafficking or traffic congestion.

“For an individual citizen … these kinds of problems might seem daunting – even impenetrable,” Eggers and Macmillan acknowledge. But, they assure, “we show myriad ways regular people can participate in the solution revolution”.

So add another resolution for 2014: hit the gym, work on that novel – and save the world.

We know the knee-jerk Washington explanation for big, persistent problems is polarisation. If only we could put aside partisan animosities, we’d figure out how to have it all: lower debts, balanced budgets, reduced poverty, stronger economies, cleaner environments.

Eggers and Macmillan reject that premise. Government isn’t just too divided. It is too limited in scope, too caught in old silos, too burdened by our ever-growing expectations. “The defining feature of Western-style government – its success in catering to a wide variety of citizen needs – has become its greatest liability,” they write. “Governments are going broke while contorting themselves into ever stranger positions to satisfy often contradictory constituent demands.”

Enter the problem-solvers! “Business should no longer solely cede the solving of social problems to governments and non-profits,” Eggers and Macmillan write. And they devote much of the book to profiling social enterprises that, through innovative and hi-tech means, are fixing stuff that needs fixing.

There’s Recyclebank, which encourages people to turn in their trash for points towards holidays, discounts and other prizes from hundreds of companies. The trick: a sensor on recycling bins than can be scanned so that individual accounts receive credit according to the bin’s weight.

There’s a fascinating competition, started by Dartmouth business school professors, to develop a $300 (R3 000) ready-to-build home. And car-sharing services such as Zipcar and Car2Go.

The authors offer many more compelling stories of social enterprises transforming the world, invariably with names that fuse two everyday words into an uber-innovative compound (ResearchGate, CrowdRise, WeFunder) or that place full stops in clever spots (, d.light).

If this book were nothing more than mini-profiles of business breakthroughs aimed at social change, it would still be worthwhile – just maybe not a work that, you know, disrupts the think-scape. So Eggers and Macmillan go revolutionary, laying out the contours of a complicated yet maddeningly vague “solution economy”.

Forget land, labour and capital goods. The key factors of production in the solution economy are the “wavemakers” – the “for-profit, non-profit and governmental organisations or individuals that revolutionise how the world approaches thorny social problems”.

Wavemakers work through “solution markets” via “public-value exchanges” (such as innovation prizes or crowdfunding exercises) enabled by “disruptive technologies” (anything internet-related) – with success measured in “impact currencies” (data, reputation, social outcomes, citizen capital). All of these combine to create “solution ecosystems”.

And so we get passages like this one: “Much like the unique, converging causes of a problem, the resulting problem-solving ecosystem emerges and expands through its own distinct process.

“Certain versatile elements are adapted, technologies are leveraged, and currencies gain new context. Existing exchanges and business models may find fresh relevance in the budding ecosystem, and participants, often playing non-traditional roles, contribute to the flow of both resources and ideas, allowing new self-sustaining solution markets to thrive.”

It’s easy to poke fun at the breathlessness of The Solution Revolution, but it’s also necessary, because the authors’ utopianism clouds the risks of the solution economy. They mention any down-sides only in passing. For example, in a lengthy ode to cloud-computing: “One caution: the lines can blur when it comes to who is responsible for protecting data housed in the cloud.”

Or when praising a Pentagon marketplace for military mobile applications: “Of course, there are also dangers. The ease of bringing military-strength apps to soldiers may also mean non-military individuals may get their hands on similar apps, presenting safety and security risks to citizens. The low barrier to development also puts it within reach for militant and terrorist groups.”

Yes, there’s also that.

The innovations the authors outline, and the possibilities they imagine, are fascinating and tantalising. But “revolution” is an overstatement.

Revolutions upend power structures, while the solution economy depends on them. Although these enterprises are multiplying in the US, Britain, Australia, India and parts of Africa, for instance, the authors note that they’re barely evident in much of the rest of the world. Why?

“The solution economy grows to fill the space it’s given,” they write, “and certain regions offer habitats more hospitable… than others.”

And who creates that space? Surprise – it’s those creaky, siloed-up governments that Eggers and Macmillan dismiss so quickly at the outset.

The role of government in solving or causing problems is a recurring focus of 22 Ideas to Fix the World, an anthology of conversations with notable academics and activists, edited by political scientists Piotr Dutkiewicz and Richard Sakwa. It is an unusual volume: The 22 interview subjects are all men, they largely lean left and they’re pretty pessimistic, despite the optimistic title. But the book still provides sobering counterpoints to Eggers and Macmillan.

Sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein could be ridiculing the wavemakers when he imagines a conclave of business leaders plotting PR strategy: “No, we have to sound progressive. Everything must change so that nothing will change. We’ll be green capitalists, we’ll be this, we’ll be that.”

But microcredit pioneer Muhammad Yunus seems on board with the revolution: “How can we create a business on the basis of selflessness? What would that look like? How might I create a business to solve certain problems, rather than simply to create financial benefit for myself?” Economist Kemal Dervis is more critical of technical innovation than Eggers and Macmillan are; he worries that new technologies have “reduced the need for labour while creating a skill premium in the workforce”.

And economist Joseph Stiglitz could be speaking for the group when he blames economic turmoil and income inequality on oversimplified macroeconomic models, faulty government policy and a “democratic deficit” in “global governance”. Stiglitz writes, “We have rules where we don’t need to have them and don’t have rules where we need them.”

With challenges this big, what can an individual do?

Eggers and Macmillan’s final chapter (Creating Your Own Solution Revolution) attempts an answer but falls a little short. “Forget for a moment about how you currently do things,” they advise. “Begin by asking, ‘What is my goal?’ And this time, ignore the caveats and parameters that usually filter the question. Think bigger.”

They tell us to focus on outcome, not process. To risk failure. To create an environment that encourages exploration.

All good advice, but I was hoping for something more specific. Maybe Gates has something I can use. He’s the one bugging me to fix the world.

“People often ask me, ‘What can I do? How can I help?’” Gates writes in a 2 200-word Wired essay reflecting on his experience and philosophy of philanthropy.

His answer for how to help the poor: “Rich-world governments need to maintain or even increase foreign aid, which has saved millions of lives and helped many more people lift themselves out of poverty. It helps when policymakers hear from voters, especially in tough economic times, when they’re looking for ways to cut budgets.”

Plus this: “If you write great code or are an expert in genomics or know how to develop new seeds, I’d encourage you to learn more about the problems of the poorest and see how you can help.”

* Carlos Lozada is the editor of The Washington Post’s Outlook section.

** The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Independent Newspapers.

Washington Post- Bloomberg