Tourism body slams insurers for non-cover

The Tourism Business Council of SA has launched a blistering attack on the insurance sector, saying the hospitality and tourism sectors were facing collapse because insurers had turned their backs on their clients. Supplied

The Tourism Business Council of SA has launched a blistering attack on the insurance sector, saying the hospitality and tourism sectors were facing collapse because insurers had turned their backs on their clients. Supplied

Published Jul 3, 2020

Share

The Tourism Business Council of SA has launched a blistering attack on the insurance sector, saying the hospitality and tourism sectors were facing collapse because insurers had turned their backs on their clients.

The council said that by refusing to honour business interruption claims, insurers were destroying the livelihoods of millions of people who depend on the sectors.

The council’s chief executive, Tshifhiwa Tshivhengwa; Ryan Woolley, the chief executive of Insurance Claims Africa, a public loss adjuster; Meg Fargher from Budmarsh in Magaliesburg; and William van der Riet of the Cathedral Peak Hotel in the Drakensberg, addressed the media.

The sectors sustain more than 1.5 million jobs and contribute about 8.6 percent to the gross domestic product. Travel and tourism drive many small and medium enterprises, creating mass employment, particularly in rural areas. Tourism adds about R206.5 billion to the supply chain annually, feeding vehicle manufacture, agriculture, fuel, textiles, furniture, security, marketing and other sectors.

Woolley, whose company is representing more than 500 tourism and hospitality claimants against insurers, said contingent business interruption cover for the tourism and hospitality sector were boutique products covering additional risks, such as illness, murder and even lion attacks.

“Insurers claim pandemics are not an insurable event, but they could have underwritten that. If it hasn’t been specifically excluded, it’s included.”

He said they were sympathetic to the insurers, because they were probably not in a position to pay the entire claims value, and they were being let down by international reinsurers, but insurers must negotiate, to “give everybody the ability to survive”.

Tshivhengwa said insurers’ refusal to pay was a tragedy the government did not comprehend.

“When a business can’t operate or closes down, it affects the farms, the car sector, construction, curtain makers, school and social projects in communities, services from the banks, etc. When you devastate an industry, it ripples down the entire value chain,” Tshivhengwa said.

The sectors have lost about R748 million a day since March 26.

“It’s time for insurers to show up, not to come up with excuses. By the time these issues are resolved in court, people will be on the street.”

Insurers’ refusal to pay was the death knell for businesses. Fargher said: “Destitution is lurking very close.”

“The situation is very serious for us. We have no cash, no income, creditors are owed over R600 000, Eskom is threatening to cut our power, we have overheads and no income. It’s like watching a child slip out of your hands. How do we tell our staff there is no money? ... These chief executives are earning 10000 more than one of my staff.”

Van der Riet said: “Our overheads exceed R800 000 a month. We have UIF, medical aid, etc to pay.

“We owe millions. We have been strung along, sent from pillar to post, for three months. We’ve supplied all the information they asked. We put money aside for a rainy day, and when we turn to our insurers, they slam the door in our faces.”

PERSONAL FINANCE 

Related Topics: