In a presentation at the recent annual conference of the Actuarial Society of South Africa in Cape Town, David Gluckman and Danie van Zyl, respectively head of special projects and head of guaranteed investments at Sanlam Employee Benefits, examined the advantages and disadvantages of in-fund living annuities versus retail living annuities for retiring members.
Gluckman said that although there was still a demand for guaranteed, or life, annuities, there has been a huge move among retiring South Africans over the past several years to living annuities. (A life annuity is a pension product you buy from a life assurance company, which pays a pension for life. A living annuity is an investment product in which you can choose the underlying investments and the amount you draw down as a pension each year. However, you risk running out of money before you die.)
Gluckman says boards of trustees can choose any annuity products to be part of the trustee-endorsed annuity strategy. “Options include both living annuity and life annuity products, or hybrid life/living annuity solutions, or combinations, such as a life annuity for one segment of members and living annuity for another segment. All of these can either be structured on an In-fund basis or an out-of-fund basis,” he says.
In addition to the differences in legal structure, holders of in-fund living annuities are likely to pay less in administration, advice and investment costs.
Says Gluckman: “It’s desirable that financial advisers advising members retiring from large retirement funds familiarise themselves with these in-fund products and that they begin putting these options on the table.”