Independent Online

Wednesday, July 6, 2022

Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView weather by locationView market indicators

SA’s cities held back by innovation, transport, and environmental issues – not even CT and Jhb are good enough

South African cities are held back primarily by innovation, transport and environmental scores. Picture: Steward Masweneng/Pexels

South African cities are held back primarily by innovation, transport and environmental scores. Picture: Steward Masweneng/Pexels

Published Jun 17, 2022

Share

A top-ranked global city is an international hub for business and culture. It has a large and diverse economy with a strong cultural scene, education and world-leading infrastructure. It's a city that's difficult to replicate, so it attracts some of the best talent.

Unfortunately, South Africa ranks badly across all categories – held back primarily by innovation, transport and environmental scores, according to the Schroders Global Cities Index.

Story continues below Advertisement

The Index looks to help real estate investors by identifying and ranking some of the best and brightest global cities according to four categories – economics, transport, innovation and environmental, says Tom Walker, co-head of Global Listed Real Assets at international asset manager, Schroders.

Read our latest Property360 digital magazine below

“South Africa only has two big-hitters from an economic perspective – Cape Town and Johannesburg. However, neither of these is in the top 200 global cities.”

Johannesburg came in at 277 while Cape Town ranked number 316.

“However, South Africa does perform relatively well compared to other African cities, beaten only by Cairo and Alexandria in Egypt,” he says.

Story continues below Advertisement

Lack of transport infrastructure

Transport infrastructure serves a number of important roles for cities, and can help to provide access to a wider pool of job opportunities, making it an important social leveller.

“A city that has an efficient system for moving people, goods and data around will be more economically and socially sustainable as inhabitants access more potential roles, while use of cars, buses and trucks are significantly reduced, improving air quality and reducing emissions,” says Walker.

Story continues below Advertisement

For Johannesburg, the density of the formal public transport system is low relative to major European, North American and Asian cities. It’s the other way round with Cape Town – where there is better rail coverage, but more limited air connectivity.

But, Walker says Schroders find that the airport connectivity is good relative to worldwide comparisons.

“No South African city has access to the largest class of port, although Cape Town, Durban and Port Elizabeth all receive a modest positive transport score benefit from the presence of a cargo port.”

Story continues below Advertisement

That said, the World Economic Forum infrastructure quality scores remain middling for South Africa - especially with respect to the rail and road systems. Airport and port quality is scored noticeably better.

Johannesburg air quality detracts from environment score

The UN forecasts the world’s population will increase to nearly nine billion by 2035 and more than half will live in cities. Walker explains that the environmental score measures the ability of cities to respond to the demands of rapid global urbanisation and climate change.

“It focuses on three key areas, physical risks to buildings from issues like storms or wildfires, wellbeing risk to humans working in these locations from issues like air quality, and then policy, looking at how government policies may increase or decrease environmental risk.”

South Africa performs poorly mainly on the components that relate to our wellbeing and policy measures, he says.

“Wellbeing risk relates to the expectation that life will likely get more unpleasant for people living in these cities. Key metrics include water stress, heat stress, water quality, and air quality.”

He adds that Johannesburg is especially hamstrung by poor air quality.

On policy, Walker notes South Africa’s ‘middle of the pack’ average scores on carbon policy, recycling policy and general environmental policy (lowest score here).

“Scores can be improved by reducing the CO2 intensity of GDP production/CO2 per inhabitant, signing up to and sticking with international agreements on climate change, more ambitious nationally determine contributions (NDCs), and so forth,” Walker notes.

Innovation stifled by our tertiary education offering

High quality educational systems promote innovation and generate jobs in a city. Skilled graduates entering the workforce attract corporations and may launch their own businesses. The resulting wages and wealth generation, explains Walker, fuel real estate demand.

“Only four out of the nine cities* we cover in South Africa have a university in the top 1 000 universities that we consider.”

Three universities lie within the boundary of Johannesburg up to 25km outlying. Walker explains that the city benefits from the University of Pretoria, which is caught within the ‘sphere of influence’ assumed to be exercised by Johannesburg, but only two of these institutions are in the top 1 000.

“The low relative performance of the University of Witwatersrand and University of Johannesburg look to be driven by the low academic reputation score, few citations per faculty member – academics are not generating research that is cited worldwide very often versus other universities – and low employer reputation,” he says.

On the upside though, Cape Town fares a little better, with the University of Cape Town coming in higher up the rankings, thanks to a notably higher academic and employer reputation.

IOL BUSINESS

Share