London - Battery-powered plastic aircraft without flight decks – could that be the clean, green future of flight?
There is a high carbon cost to air travel – flying one passenger from London to New York and back generates roughly the same level of CO2 emissions as the average person in the EU does by heating their home for a whole year, a recent report in the UK said.
As Britons debate plans to add another runway to Heathrow airport, Friends of the Earth’s head of campaigns, Andrew Pendleton, said proposals for a new runway should be shelved “if we’re to stop runaway global warming”.
A commission into the runway plan also insists: “One new runway, even fully utilised, is compatible with continued progress towards reducing carbon emissions.”
At the press conference to launch its proposals, the chairman, Sir Howard Davies, said: “More efficient aircraft will offset the increased number of flights.”
To prove him right will require many changes, particularly in aircraft and engine design. The recent spike in oil prices forced airlines to focus even more closely on fuel efficiency. Average emissions per passenger carried are almost certain to fall marginally in the next decade because four-engined airliners such as the Boeing 747 are steadily being replaced by twin jets.
Boeing has also been evaluating liquefied natural gas as a replacement for paraffin. The fuel raises efficiency and cuts emissions but would demand massive re-engineering. Nasa is studying hybrid electric propulsion but the technology is decades away from being feasible for passenger flights.
The easiest way to reduce fuel burn is to lighten the aircraft, a factor key to the unconventional design of aeronautical visions of the future, such as the Airbus Concept Plane. Traditional aluminium is slowly being replaced by composites – in effect strong, light plastic. A study in the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment estimates composites could reduce emissions globally by up to 15 percent.
Making composites generates more than twice the emissions of aluminium production but these are quickly offset when the aircraft enters service. Alma Hodzic, professor of Advanced Materials Technologies at Sheffield University in the UK, said: “The environmental and financial savings from composites mean that these materials offer a much better solution. Fuel consumption savings with composites far outweigh the increased environmental impact from their manufacture.”
The next target is the shape of the aircraft – improved aerodynamics reduces drag and hence fuel consumption. The world’s most popular aircraft, the Boeing 737, was developed half a century ago but its basic shape remains unchanged.
Fassi Kafyeke, director of strategic technology for the Canadian aircraftmaker Bombardier, said: “The next generation will look significantly different and the industry is betting we’ll gain 16 percent efficiency by just changing plane configurations.”
Manufacturers are trying to improve lift by imparting wing-like characteristics to the fuselage, so that wings can be smaller and lighter. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has proposed a “double bubble”, where two fuselages are merged and powered by a pair of rear-mounted engines. Another idea is to abolish the cockpit. Last year, an Airbus patent visualised removing the flight deck to make the front of the aircraft more aerodynamically efficient. The pilots would work from cameras and other instruments rather than looking out of the window.
Other measures are less radical. Planes are extremely inefficient when taxiing. There are proposals for electric-powered tugs to tow them to the runway access point and back to the terminal after a flight.
Some emissions gains could be squandered if UK domestic passengers are lured from train to plane by flight subsidies. The Davies Commission urges ministers to mandate a wide network of domestic routes – reconnecting airports such as Newquay, Liverpool and Inverness to Heathrow. Rail passengers could be tempted to switch.
The Independent