BLSA welcomes #NuclearDeal ruling

Court finds SA's nuclear deal is illegal

Court finds SA's nuclear deal is illegal

Published Apr 28, 2017

Share

Johannesburg – Business Leadership SA has welcomed

Wednesday’s court ruling that effectively ends cooperation agreements between

Eskom and countries that are home to nuclear providers.

In a statement issued on Friday, the association says: “Once

again the rule of law has triumphed in South Africa.”

Its board and members of BLSA congratulate Earth Life

South Africa and Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute for

their courage and fortitude in successfully challenging the government’s proposed

nuclear deal.

Safcei and Earthlife Africa filed their application in

the Western Cape High Court in October 2015 to challenge a 2013 determination

by former Energy Minister Dipuo Peters that South Africa should procure 9 600 MW

of nuclear power.

The two organisations also challenged the

constitutionality of government agreements for procuring nuclear reactors and

asked the court to declare invalid agreements South Africa entered into with

the US, the Republic of Korea and Russia.

At the time, the NGOs claimed that South Africa was

secretly preparing a nuclear power procurement deal.

Earthlife and Safcei argued that the decision to procure

nuclear energy could bankrupt South Africa “especially since much lower-cost

options are available such as renewable energy.

Read also:  Gupta's Oakbay immune to #NuclearDeal ruling

Judge Lee Bozalek in the Western Cape High Court, by

setting aside the unconstitutional and unlawful cooperation agreements with the

US, Russia and Korea, has assured South Africans of future public participation

and more transparency, BLSA says.

“BLSA applauds this ruling, particularly given the

nuclear new build programme was a red-flag for ratings agencies. Fitch had

cited it as central to the decision to remove former Finance Minister [Nhlanhla]

Nene and recently stated it contributed to the dismissal of Minister [Pravin] Gordhan.”

It adds it also noted and supported the clear findings of

the Integrated Resource Plan, which suggests South Africa does not need a R1

trillion nuclear plan. “In our current low-growth environment the costs and

affordability of a nuclear program will strain public finances already under

pressure.”

It says: “The judge’s findings have forestalled

government from flouting constitutional requirements, sidestepping parliament

and the public and defying the standards of transparency required in a

democracy.

“Given that Eskom, assigned responsibility for

procurement, as recently as last week was seeking exemptions from certain

National Treasury regulations, BLSA welcomes the ruling that the Minister of

Energy and NERSA will make a new, more accountable determination.”

 BUSINESS REPORT ONLINE

Related Topics: