Advertorial

Ocean Basket

‘Child grant recipients up 13-fold’


Poverty

REUTERS

The number of children receiving social grants has increased 13-fold since 2001, a survey revealed on Wednesday.

Beneficiaries had risen from 800,476 in 2001 to 10,387,238 in 2011, according to the study to be published next week by the SA Institute of Race Relations.

This number would increase by another million by 2013, said researcher Lerato Moloi.

Children on the child support grant accounted for 70 percent of all people on social welfare. They received R260 a month.

In February 2011, the government announced the extension of the child support grant to all children up to the age of 18 years.

Moloi said the overall social grant beneficiaries had increased from about R3.5 million to R15m.

Old-age pension beneficiaries had increased by only 40 percent in the same period, while war veterans receiving grants had decreased by 85 percent.

This was according to Estimates on National Expenditure published by the National Treasury in 2011.

Old-age pension beneficiaries received R1140 a month. Although pensioners accounted for only 18 percent of all people on social welfare, the old-age pension accounted for the largest proportion of grant expenditure at 39 percent.

The child support grant accounted for 36 percent of total grant expenditure.

Some have argued that the child support grant acts as an incentive for teenage pregnancy.

According to the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), the number of pregnancies among girls aged 15 to 19 years peaked in 1996. This was two years before the child support grant was introduced.

The study showed that number had declined since then.

This was contrary to a report by the Limpopo health and social development department published in November last year, showing that pregnancy in schools was increasing.

“Some 16 percent of the participants admitted to falling pregnant to obtain access to the child support grant,” said Moloi.

She said more research needed to be conducted to determine the existence and extent of such a link. - Sapa

sign up

Share |  

Facebook icon

Facebook

Twitter icon

Twitter

Google icon

Google

Yahoo icon

Yahoo

Reddit icon

Reddit

del.icio.us icon

del.icio.us

Pinterest icon

Pinterest

Email

Print

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (0 votes) 0 Stars

jandr0, wrote

IOL Comments
05:00pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

@Anonymous: "I THINK GOVERNMENT SHOULD CREATE JOBS FOR THOSE GIRLS." Ah, sir or lady, you are clearly a great student of economics - because you believe jobs are just "created" out of thin air. And then, it is obvious that your preferred religion is "Governmentism," as you clearly believe that government has divine abilities. Nonsense. You definitely have no idea how the world really works. be very afraid of "government."

IOL Comments

British Brendan, wrote

IOL Comments
04:39pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

Hey Africa! If you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em. Simple.

IOL Comments

Tandiwe, wrote

IOL Comments
04:17pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

Scary! very scary picture... this is the tip of the iceberg. We need to dig deep to understand WHY,WHAT,WHERE,HOW...and WHO so as to come up with tangible, sustainable resolve for this social chaos!

IOL Comments

sello, wrote

IOL Comments
04:12pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

I think now at schools they must have a subject that will teach the teenagers about the pregnancy,what it cause to our economy and teach them about family planning.Stoping the grant its not the best solution,there are those who really depend on it.

IOL Comments

Eish, wrote

IOL Comments
04:12pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

but the more children I have, the more grants I will get. If I have lots of children I will be very rich one day. Yes eet ees good in Afrika.

IOL Comments

GO FIND WORK, wrote

IOL Comments
03:29pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

@Anonymous 2:25 - there's a study that was recently done that shows that South Africans are lazy to work. We would rather depend on grants than go find work. So, what I thought my solution is, ONLY CHILDREN WHOSE FATHERS HAVE PASSED SHOULD RECEIVE THE GRANT PROVIDED THAT THE MOTHER IS NOT WORKING.

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
03:22pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

YEP ....GRAVY TRAIN, go near a locatin you'l see tons of uncared ones running around, no house , no jobs, no food but babies GALORE !

IOL Comments

Lookout, wrote

IOL Comments
03:07pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

Something wrong with the maths here. With 10 million odd recipients at R260 the child grant alone is R2.7 Billion per month or R32 Billion pa. The total figure must be R15 Billion per month. How long can we keep that up with our shrinking tax base?

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
03:03pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

What can one do with R260 pm???. R 20 000 000 000 on arms deal and another R20 000 000 000 on corruption last year = 40 000 000 000 = R3850 each or an extra R321 pm. ANC need to get their priorities correct. Look after the people!!

IOL Comments

BigD, wrote

IOL Comments
03:00pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

The number of people on grants already greatly exceeds the number of those paying tax. The problem is that the former are set to keep increasing, whilst the latter set to decrease. Simple arithmatic tells you where this will all end - in tears, of course.

IOL Comments

Mhlaba Makhaye, wrote

IOL Comments
02:52pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

This is very disturbing, because these figures include people from Zimbabwe and other people not suppose to be getting these grants. We as workers will keep on paying tax for benefitting criminals. Gorvement must take this serious very soon we will rebel againt paying the tax

IOL Comments

JennyN, wrote

IOL Comments
02:50pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

This was a ploy to garner votes, and it has just dug the hole deeper for the poor and disenfranchised. The millions of fatherless children who are being dragged up in abject poverty (the child grant hardly coers teh cost of keeping a child alive, let alone health care, special needs and education) will be the next poor saps to vote anc because they do not know any better. The anc is literally planting and growing their own votes, because that is all these poor little things are worth to this greedy, selfish ruling party. In the meantime, the tax payers are bled dry. Its a shameful disgrace. Why don't they rather urge young women to get educated - of course, that's never going to happen because someone that can think for themselves will never continue to support the anc.

IOL Comments

brasco, wrote

IOL Comments
02:45pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

Gravy anyone ?

IOL Comments

Mother, wrote

IOL Comments
02:39pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

Is there no way they can stop those parents who have children just to obtain a grant? The money is meant to assist with the rearing of the child and not support the parent's bad habits. It beaks my heart to see kids being born to people who cannot afford them, yet family planning is free. Those who work will have an average of 2 to 3 kids while those unemployed and uneducated have too many to handle. I dont agree with the control some countries have in how many kids people are allowed, but some people are just not responsible enough to make their own choices...it's always the kids who suffer...

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
02:35pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

How can anyone feed, educate, clothe a child with R260 a month, that works out to +- R8.00 a day. The only solution here is for people not to have kids if you cant afford it. I think its so important that if you are planning on having kids to make sure you are able to fullfil at least all of their basic needs and to stop relying on the state to do it for you......

IOL Comments

EISH, wrote

IOL Comments
02:34pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

That is why you see so many children with runny noses in the poor areas. The government is the reason for this!!! This is way we see so many beggars on the street, this is way we get break ins at our houses. Thanks Government. You are NOT helping. If the parents know they won't get anything they will stop making them.

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
02:25pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

We are fast approaching the point where more people will be on welfare than are employed, its just wrong.

IOL Comments

gimmee muhnee, wrote

IOL Comments
02:11pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

so 25% of the majority population lives on child grants while most of the rest of the majority population live on unemployment grant and the aged majority population lives on pension grants.

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
02:11pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

Child support grants have become South Africa's DOLE ... it has become easier to get a child support grant than to work .. but this is not sustainable as the tax base cannot support this kind of burden and it will ultimately ruin the economy - becuase it will now be impossible to ever withdraw it

IOL Comments

Mlu, wrote

IOL Comments
02:04pm on 18 January 2012
IOL Comments

The problem with child grant is that it encourages teenage pregnancy. A child growing up in a poor family will make sure she falls pregnant so that she could get the R260.00 a month. Once she falls pregnant, she bunks school. Should the amount not satisfy her, she will fall pregnant again. Now those kids will grow up in a poor household of child grants. Once they grow old, they will enter the cycle...fall pregnant, bunk school and get child grant. In the meantime, you and I are working very hard so that our children are not caught up in this vicious cycle of sad reality. The harder we work, the more child grants we pay. Eish, JZ, when is this pathetic state of affairs gonna be stopped?

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 20 of 31

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks
IOL-Social networks

Mobile
on m.br.co.za

IOL-Social networks

Newsletters
Subscribe

IOL-Social networks

RSS feeds
Subscribe

Sudoku