Fresh fracking furore

Comment on this story


br fracking 885

Independent Newspapers

A group of Capetonians take to the streets to voice their opposition to fracking. A new environmental impact report by the US Environmental Protection Agency says that fracking in Wyoming in the US is the likely source of contamination of groundwater, after carrying out a three-year study at the site. File photo: Henk Kruger.

A new environmental impact report by the US Environmental Protection Agency finding that hydraulic fracturing – known as “fracking” – in Wyoming was the likely source of contamination of groundwater appears not to have put a damper on interest in extracting shale gas in the Karoo.

Royal Dutch Shell – potentially the largest player in the new industry in South Africa – yesterday was adamant that the conditions for fracking would be completely different in South Africa as the operation would be carried out at far greater depths than in the US.

It also placed a question mark over the report, noting that it was merely a draft.

Jonathan Deal of the Treasure the Karoo Action Group (TKAG), said the finding – after a three-year study – that fracking was the likely source of contamination of groundwater near the town of Pavillion in Wyoming – should send “shock waves” through the oil and gas industry, including those companies interested in fracking in the Karoo.

The agency had dug two monitoring wells in the aquifer in the Pavillion area and found that synthetic chemicals such as glycols and alcohols “consistent with gas production” had been detected, as well as hydraulic fracturing fluids, including highly noxious benzene concentrations well above safe drinking water standards. The report also noted high methane levels in the area.

Deal said: “There are more than a thousand cases, especially in the US, where fracking is blamed for groundwater contamination, but the oil and gas industry consistently claims that they are unaware of any documented cases.”

br Jonathan Deal 2177

The national co-ordinator of the TKAG, Jonathan Deal, says the finding should send shock waves. Photo: Tiro Ramatlhatse.

Independent Newspapers

Jan-Willem Eggink, the upstream general manager for Shell South Africa, said the mining at Pavillion – carried out by Encana, a Canadian company that owns the gas field around the town – should answer any questions relating to the interim agency report, “but some of the findings have been disputed”.

Eggink also argued that fracking in South Africa would take place at depths of “two to three kilometres down” below the water table. Comparing Wyoming with the proposed operations in the Karoo was “comparing apples with pears”.

Shell would be applying “appropriate operating standards” and contamination of water would not occur.

Deal said fracking would involve boring through aquifers to get to greater depths which carried the risk of alien chemicals escaping into groundwater.

Hydraulic fracturing forms part of a complex procedure – involving water, sand and additive injection at high pressure – that makes it possible to extract natural gas from deep below the earth’s surface.

Last December, the Petroleum Agency of SA (Pasa) accepted an application for exploration rights by Shell for an area of 95 000km2 in the Karoo’s eastern, central and western area, from Dordrecht in the east to Sutherland in the west.

Two moratoriums on exploration have subsequently been placed by Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu while the department carries out a study of the potential environmental impact and economic potential of hydraulic fracturing.

The moratoriums have effectively stopped Shell in its tracks, but the latest six-month moratorium expires in February and it is unlikely that it will be imposed again. Shabangu’s spokesman would not budge on which way the pendulum on fracking would fall. “The minister will communicate this,” Zingaphi Jakuja said.

Other companies that have shown an interest in fracking include Falcon Oil & Gas, which has sought exploration rights for an area of 100 000km2 in the Karoo that stretches from Ceres in the west to Klipplaat in the east.

Bundu Oil & Gas has focused on an area of 35 000km2 around Graaff-Reinet, Pearston, Somerset East and Cradock. Sungu Sungu has also applied for a technical co-operation permit.

Sasol, which led a consortium with Statoil and Chesapeake Energy Corporation, withdrew its hydraulic fracturing interest in an 88 000km2 area across southern KwaZulu Natal, the Eastern Cape and parts of the Free State.

Eggink has argued that South Africa could become energy self-sufficient within a decade if commercially producible gas volumes were discovered in the Karoo.

He reported the US Energy Information Administration estimated that there were 485 trillion cubic feet of shale gas in the Karoo which would make South Africa energy self-sufficient in for decades. - Donwald Pressly


sign up
 
 

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

     

Witness, wrote

IOL Comments
01:49am on 21 December 2011
IOL Comments

Read the report. The headline should really read "EPA Fails to Nail Shale". The reservoir in Wyoming is a sand, not a shale. It is very shallow, not deep. There was zero - Repeat ZERO - contamination of ANY drinking water wells of any residents. The only water with traces of chemicals were deep aquifers that were not used by anyone. The people's wells were clear. That should really send shockwaves through those scare-mongering Eco groups who would have you believe the sky is falling.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
04:51pm on 18 December 2011
IOL Comments

I say frack all you want, we need the money now, we can deal with the side effects later.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
08:41pm on 15 December 2011
IOL Comments

like politicians they all smile & lie & devastate the water source to fill their purse with money 7 to hell with the consequenses....look who is in political power

Report this

IOL Comments

Sputnik, wrote

IOL Comments
02:21pm on 15 December 2011
IOL Comments

@anonymous 0945 (1412) ..and those ordinary people also don't read about the millions of fracking wells that are not involved in any controversy whatsoever. But I guess that doesn't suit those with vested (financial) interest in having this fail. It is purely ludicrous to suggest that every lamb is going to die, ALL the water is going to be poisoned, and the crops are going to start glowing in the dark. Can you not hear the crazy hysteria being chanted. Take a break and call for the banning of cars. These are killing South Africas children,pregnant women,men and animals every day. And they are also used for crime. But maybe that doesn't suit you.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
09:45pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

Wouldn't it be so easy if the people concerned about fracking are just crazy,rich people,driving 4x4's to Cavendish when they have nothing better to do. However,in the real world it's ordinary people that worry because they read reports from the US about the impact on agriculture, they read about bans moratoria on fracking in more than 63 municipalities in the US, a complete ban in France etc and even a recent moratorium in the Netherlands,Shell's home country. And if you think because you don't live in the Karoo that you can escape the effects,think again: lamb comes from the Karoo,water for fracking will be taken from the Orange River (18 million liter per well per event) and the radio-active toxic wastewater will be dumped in a river again - no magic place for it to go. And if you're eating crops irrigated from that river and you'll share the fruits of fracking. The chemicals used cause cancer,fertility problems etc - no-one should have to be exposed to it - especially people that connot afford to take the companies responsible to court. The water pollution in Wyoming is permanent. Do we want South Africas children,pregnant women,men and animals to share in this? No thank you. ( In 1995 the fracking industry in the US applied to be exempted from the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act and ex- Haliburton CEO and then vice-president Dick Cheney gave them that exemption. That together with the fact that cases of water contamination have been settled on a non-disclosure in exchange for clean water by the truckload have resulted in limited public reports on fracking until now ) The gas is going nowhere - so wait until it can be done safely.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
08:08pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

Where do we hang these people who want to damage our scare water so that it the water will never be drinkable again ... These people lie like our politicians

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
04:45pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

The zeal with which the environmentalists scour the press for "evidence" is impressive. Less impressive is the way that they distort the discussion. You would not know, for instance, that 30% of the US's gas currently comes from shale gas - but we hear about a single incident of pollution causes a "furore". If we applied the same thinking to motor cars, every time there was a fatal accident, we would put a moratorium on the use of cars. The real reason that the environmentalists want to ban fracking is that cheap gas would undercut the crazy renewable energy projects that suffering SA taxpayers are having to subsidise which make electricity even more expensive than they already are. Many of the anti-fracking activists are associated with organisations that have big profits to make from renewables. Go figure and don't believe everything you read, particularly if it is written on "green lies" note paper.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
04:44pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

Why would anybody believe anything Shell says? Just look at what they did - and are still doing - in Nigeria. Does SA want to go the same route and have a large part of the country laid to waste forever, whilst Shell walks away when they have made enough money? The answer must be an emphatic NO!

Report this

IOL Comments

Sally, wrote

IOL Comments
04:32pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

I can't believe there's anyone who can't see through the lies and cover-ups. At least not in South Africa, where our BS meter is pretty good:) There's no way to say fractures won't reach the water table because they're deeper in the Karoo. Before, they said there was no way they could reach aquifers in North America. Fracking is like shattering a wine glass on the floor. NO ONE KNOWS how it will fracture. And the earth is not homogeneous like glass. Also from the USA, hundreds of cases of leaks from cement casing causing leaks. ALSO air quality issues now coming to the fore http:www.alternet.orgstory153417air_too_dangerous_to_breathe%3A_how_gas_drilling_can_turn_rural_communities_into_industrial_wastelands_%5Bwith_photos%5D ... Earthquakes now in Ohio too. AND, then there's radioactivity. In at least one area in the Karoo, near Fraserburg in the Northern Cape, which is within Shell's giant concessions area and where the company and its PR firm have met with local officials, recent uranium exploration has shown there's massive underground deposits. Only a fool would want to frack when community group-purchased solar deal in California is just THREE years from price parity with the grid. http:www.grist.orgsolar-power2011-12-05-group-purchase-gets-residential-solar-to-grid-parity-in-los

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
04:11pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

GOOGLE fracking causes cancer - there are 16 million hits. This is not coincidence.

Report this

IOL Comments

Ed, wrote

IOL Comments
03:45pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

It's ironic that all those anti-fracking activists drive 4 X 4's, live in Constantia and Clifton, have high paying white collar positions, and don't even know where the Karoo is, let alone what fracking entails. They have no concern for the energy and employment crisis in South Africa and somehow believe that cattle flatulence is going to suffice for the world's future energy needs. Gas is clean energy, efficient and cheap. Out of all the areas in SA, where would be the safest and least consequential to drill for gas? The Garden Route? The Kruger NP perhaps? Or a desert? Come on people, why don't you try and find a worthy cause, like the murder rate, road deaths, rape, domestic violence, substance abuse, etc.?

Report this

IOL Comments

Meme-Man, wrote

IOL Comments
03:25pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

DECEMBER 9, 2011: "Chemicals found in a Wyoming town's drinking water likely are associated with hydraulic fracturing, the Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday," http:online.wsj.comarticleSB10001424052970203501304577086472373346232.html

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
03:05pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

This fracking issue in the Karoo is being driven purely by corruption and greed. Guaranteed that Shell is offering some corrupt Govt Official a backhander to advance their fracking agenda in South Africa ... Also why Shell, why not SASOL!??

Report this

IOL Comments

Sputnik, wrote

IOL Comments
01:32pm on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

You guys are right - - Shell Frack Off --- We want our real friends to come do fracking here, the Chinese. No worry about special permits, they'll go in and do what needs to be done overnight. No worries about environmental studies (that's not for Africa anyway). No worries about under-paying SA workers, they will bring their own (probably convicts). And don't worry about environmental damage, if something goes wrong they just find somewhere else to frack. Profits will be enormous, enough for lots of politicians. And don't worry about the whingers, our friends the Chinese can't understand them anyway. Shell, for once and for all,,,,, FRACK OFF

Report this

IOL Comments

Earth hugger, wrote

IOL Comments
11:28am on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

Why is South Africa allowing this, cant the people see the devasation that is going to inflict us and we need to prevent this .....what was COP 17 about.....

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
11:26am on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

Any bets that fracking is frackingly going to take place in SA regardless of the negative environmental impacts?

Report this

IOL Comments

Jerome, wrote

IOL Comments
10:56am on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

We'll be self sufficient and everyone in the Karoo wasteland will have cancer.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
10:49am on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

fracking liars

Report this

IOL Comments

bobsled, wrote

IOL Comments
10:44am on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

You can't believe a single word that comes out of the mouths of those who have billions of dollars at stake...

Report this

IOL Comments

The Gecko, wrote

IOL Comments
10:32am on 14 December 2011
IOL Comments

Perhaps, if Mr Eggink could provide us with evidence of even ONE documented case where fracking was done and did NOT contaminate the ground water of cause other serious pollution, we would be more willing to listen. But thus far their entire case is built on pointing out the differences between other cases and what they want to do in the Karoo. Which frankly, doesn't mean a thing...

Report this

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 20 of 20

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks
Sudoku